Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Postfix, I think, interpets "foo+bar" the same as "foo".
yup it does, but "foo" has to be a valid localpart so
"foo+bar" -> foo
foo+baz -> foo
f+oobar -> f - which is a different user (aliases set aside)
famous call on plus addressing, and you it's just a default you can
Martin Vilcans wrote:
> Try the SMTP spec. IIRC there's a passage there that says that the
> server should try to make sense of addresses that don't map directly
> to a user name. Specifically, it says that firstname.lastname should
> be mapped to the user with those first and last names.
Short s
On Jan 20, 2008 8:58 PM, Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are you saying that when i have 2 gmail addresses
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> they are actually treated the same? That is plain wrong and would break a
> lot of mail addresses as I have 2 that follow just
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Postfix, I think, interpets "foo+bar" the same as "foo".
Gmail does the same. It's quite useful - apart from using it to
determine which site I signed up to has sent me mail, I also use it so I
can have multiple Guild Wars accounts using the same email account e.g.
[EMAI
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:13:03 +, Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Martin Marcher:
>
>> are you saying that when i have 2 gmail addresses
>>
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>> they are actually treated the same? That is plain wrong and would break
>> a lot of mail addresses as I hav
Martin Marcher:
> are you saying that when i have 2 gmail addresses
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> they are actually treated the same? That is plain wrong and would break a
> lot of mail addresses as I have 2 that follow just this pattern and they
> are delivered correctly
En Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:38:06 -0200, Joshua Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribi�:
> My task is this: Loop through an email and create as many combinations of
> periods as possible. So all the combinations for blah would be:
>
> b.lah
> bl.ah
> bla.h
> b.l.ah
> b.la.h
> bl.a.h
I'd use a recursive
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:38 Joshua Gilman wrote:
> So I have a very interesting task ahead of me and it is to loop through an
> email using the 'gmail dot trick'. Essentially this trick puts periods
> throughout your email to make it look different. Even though it has
> periods gmail will repl
