In message , Aahz wrote:
> My suspicion is that very very few medium/large systems are truly
> "well-designed".
Conway’s law applies: the product of any human endeavour reflects the
organizational structure that produced it. If the individuals/groups writing
the different parts of the software
In message , MRAB
wrote:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
>>> recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
>>
>> That's good to learn, because for years
Am 07.05.2010 04:48, schrieb TomF:
On 2010-05-06 18:20:02 -0700, Trent Nelson said:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops
In article <2010050619481239450-tomfsess...@gmailcom>,
TomF wrote:
>
>I don't doubt it. But I'm not really interested in line (micro) level
>code issues at the moment. Not that my code couldn't stand being
>improved, but I'm more interested in seeing how medium/large OO python
>systems are de
On 2010-05-06 18:20:02 -0700, Trent Nelson said:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops at a Python conference
and put some
> I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
> well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops at a Python conference
and put some up of your work up on the projector for 20+ deve
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
That's good to learn, because for years I have been intentionally
failing in order to
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
> I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
> recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
That's good to learn, because for years I have been intentionally
failing in order to learn from it and beco
On May 4, 5:34 pm, TomF wrote:
> On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
> > (I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
> > too...)
>
> True, although whether that's time well spent is another question.
I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
rec
In article <4be132f1$0$20639$426a7...@news.free.fr>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>The more bad code (mine or not) I have to maintain (or even just read
>and understand), the more I pay attention to my own design and code
>quality. Sometimes you only understand why something is bad, why it is
TomF a écrit :
On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
(snip)
(I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
too...)
True, although whether that's time well spent is another question.
The more bad code (mine or not) I have to maintain (or even just read
and understand
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
TomF wrote:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone commen
On May 4, 12:37 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> TomF a écrit :
>
> > I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
> > well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
> > Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
> > whether its
> From: alex23
> (I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
> too...)
Oh, very true. And not just true for python. But, only if an 'expoert'
points out why it is bad and provides an alternative. And saying things
like, "it isn't pyhonic" or that such and such is a more "
TomF wrote:
> I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
> well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
> Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
> whether its code is well-designed and worth studying?
Here's a viewpoint
TomF a écrit :
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
whether its code is well-designed and worth studying?
Carl makes some v
On May 3, 12:24 pm, TomF wrote:
> I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
> well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
> Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
> whether its code is well-designed and worth studying?
17 matches
Mail list logo
