Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2006 01:33:30 -0700, "Frank Millman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
> > In my particular case, when I do subclass Test, y is always True.
> > Therefore I can rewrite it like this -
> >
> > class Test2(Test):
> > def __in
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Frank Millman wrote:
>
> This "replacement" happens at instance initialisation time - ie, after
> the class object have been created. If you don't want this to happen,
> either skip the call to Test.__init__ in Test2.__init__, or make this
> call with False as second p
Frank Millman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Assume a simple class -
>
> class Test(object):
> def __init__(self,x):
> self.x = x
> def getx(self):
> print self.x
>
> Test(1).getx()
> Test(2).getx()
> Test(3).getx()
>
> As expected, the results are 1,2,3
>
> Assume a slight variat
Frank Millman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Assume a simple class -
>
> class Test(object):
> def __init__(self,x):
> self.x = x
> def getx(self):
> print self.x
>
> Test(1).getx()
> Test(2).getx()
> Test(3).getx()
>
> As expected, the results are 1,2,3
>
> Assume a slight variation,
Hi all
Assume a simple class -
class Test(object):
def __init__(self,x):
self.x = x
def getx(self):
print self.x
Test(1).getx()
Test(2).getx()
Test(3).getx()
As expected, the results are 1,2,3
Assume a slight variation, where given a particular condition I want a
partic
