> "PN" == Pekka Niiranen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PN> Hi there,
PN> I have two scripts. The first "main.py" sets some variables
PN> and then imports another called "gen.py". The idea is to
PN> provide "main.py" that defines some paths, variables etc.
PN> without using Windows environment va
In main.py, execfile("gen.py")
or
In gen.py, have something like
from __main__ import env_params
or
In main.py, have something like
import __builtins__; __builtins__.env_params = env_params
or
call a function in the gen.py with env_params as a parameter
import gen
gen.do(env_p
Thanks,
I will analyse these 4 options and select the most suitable
since there are other issues involved too, like
"the "main.py" reads contents of a file to a list that gets
passed to the "gen.py" with dictionary "env_params"".
I try to avoid parsing the contents of the file both
in "main.py" an
Hi there,
I have two scripts. The first "main.py" sets some variables
and then imports another called "gen.py". The idea is to
provide "main.py" that defines some paths, variables etc.
without using Windows environment variables. Various other "hackers"
will make additional Python scripts (subrout