I definitely prefer the 'fool' style.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
>> I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP 8 says:
>>
>> ---
>> |The closing brace/bracket/parenthesis on multi-line
On 07/08/2013 03:39 AM, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
Hi all,
(English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
--
On 8 July 2013 13:02, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:39:21 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
> Imagine:
>>
>> """
>> a_wonderful_set_of_things = {
>> bannanas_made_of_apples,
>> chocolate_covered_horns,
>> doors_that_slide,
>> china_but_on_the_moon,
>> buffalo_with_
On 07/08/2013 08:02 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:39:21 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
Or you can (be sane) and put it at no indentation:
"""
a_wonderful_set_of_things = {
...,
not_missing_an_end_brace
}
"""
I consider that the least aesthetically pleasing,
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:39:21 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> (English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
>>
>> I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
>>
>>
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 07:32:01 +0800, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
>
> I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
>
> ---
> |The closing bra
On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
>
> I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
>
> ---
> |The closing brace/bracket/parent
Hi all,
(English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
---
|The closing brace/bracket/parenthesis on multi-line constructs may
|either line up und
Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is my problem. There is ConfigParser, StringIO, Queue,
> HTMLParser etc. They are all part of the standard library.
Yes, many modules in the standard library don't conform to PEP 8;
these are known bugs.
> Most of these are modules with only a "mai
> will Py3K change the standard library names in order to follow PEP 8?)
Just continue down the list of PEPs and you will find the answer:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/#modules-to-rename
This covers built-in modules. It doesn't cover 3rd party modules, like
wx. Most likely you will st
Hi All,
Here is what I read in PEP 8:
> Package and Module Names
>
> Modules should have short, all-lowercase names. Underscores can be used
> in the module name if it improves readability. Python packages should
> also have short, all-lowercase names, although the use o
12 matches
Mail list logo
