> And that's a really sideways way to take a swipe at someone while
> pretending to be too high-minded to do it (plus see James's comments about
> other possible explanations). If you kiddies would take this fight out
> into the playground perhaps the rest of the class can continue.
It wasn't m
Scott wrote:
>
>> Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
>
> Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
> going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
> outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciat
Scott wrote:
>>Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
>
>
> Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
> going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
> outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciate
> Please forgo the psychological self analysis from your future posts.
Unfortunately I can't, that's how I am, love it or leave it. But if your
going to be condescending about it, please leave your future replies in your
outbox. Now don't take that as I don't appreciate your reply. I just d
On Apr 12, 3:29 pm, "Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if most of my question's seem "petty", but as I've said before, I
> need to know the petty just because I need to know.
>
> This question is more along the lines of just having you guys either agree
> or disgree with me, and if disa
I'm sorry if most of my question's seem "petty", but as I've said before, I
need to know the petty just because I need to know.
This question is more along the lines of just having you guys either agree
or disgree with me, and if disagreeing to give the reasoning behind it, to
further my unders
