On 08Aug2018 21:03, ma...@mail.com wrote:
[...] It seems that I do not really need NLTK. split() will do me. [...]
+1 QOTW
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>From the PSF board candidates statements:
Tim Peters
==
While my efforts to get the PSF recognized as a bank holding company
(and so qualify for billions of dollars in US TARP aid) haven't yet
succeeded, I'm apparently the only director who even thought about it --
On Jul 28, 7:07 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:42:37 -0700, Russ P. wrote:
> >> +1 QOTW
>
> > Do you realize what an insult that is to everyone else who has posted
> > here in the past week?
>
&
On Jul 28, 9:07 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:42:37 -0700, Russ P. wrote:
> >> +1 QOTW
>
> > Do you realize what an insult that is to everyone else who has posted
> > here in the past week?
>
&
On 28 Jul 2008 14:07:44 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:42:37 -0700, Russ P. wrote:
>
> >> +1 QOTW
> >
> > Do you realize what an insult that is to everyone else who has posted
> > here in the past week?
&
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:42:37 -0700, Russ P. wrote:
>> +1 QOTW
>
> Do you realize what an insult that is to everyone else who has posted
> here in the past week?
Actually I don't. I hadn't realised that when a person believes that
somebody has made an especially clever,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
Yes! One of the biggest advantages to unit testing is that you never
ever deliver the same bug to the client twice. Delivering software
with a bug is bad but delivering it with the same bug after it was
reported and fixed is calamitous.
QOTW for sure.
--Scott
On Feb 16, 2:59 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Banks wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 1:39 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Aahz wrote:
> >>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>> Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 10:50
Carl Banks wrote:
> On Feb 16, 1:39 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aahz wrote:
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>> Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 16, 1:39 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aahz wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Steven D'Ap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> IHNTA, IJWTSA
>> Thanks, but... That defines IHNTA, but not IJWTSA or IJWTW. "I just
>> want to say...?" "I just want to watch?"- Hide quoted text -
>
> I just want to what?
Exactly!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> IHNTA, IJWTSA
>
> Thanks, but... That defines IHNTA, but not IJWTSA or IJWTW. "I just
> want to say...?" "I just want to watch?"- Hide quoted text -
I just want to what?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Aahz wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>> Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0800, castironpi wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0800, castironpi wrote:
What is dream hardware for the Python interpreter?
>>> I'm not sure tha
On Feb 14, 10:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0800, castironpi wrote:
>
> >> What is dream hardware for the Python interpreter?
>
> >I'm not sure that the Python interpreter act
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0800, castironpi wrote:
>>
>> What is dream hardware for the Python interpreter?
>
>I'm not sure that the Python interpreter actually does dream, but if it's
>anything like me, it's probably
"John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that case, don't burn bandwith by banal banter, post the examples!
+1 here - Hendrik
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
untry singers, blues musicians,
> >>British hard rock bands, or melodic death metal acts.
> >
> > Any other votes for this being QOTW?
>
> +1 here
>
+1 here, too
--
Felipe.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
l acts.
Any other votes for this being QOTW?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"LL YR VWL R BLNG T S" -- www.nancybuttons.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
h metal acts.
>
> Any other votes for this being QOTW?
+1 here
Sybren
--
Sybren Stüvel
Stüvel IT - http://www.stuvel.eu/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> statement:
>
> Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
>
> In the state of the onion address?
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2006/09/21/onion.html
Think he's just too charmi
; There is also this:
>> 'But I think the basic Perl paradigm is "Whatever-oriented programming."'
>
> But what this really means, in practise, is "dis-oriented programming."
I think now we got our QOTW.
Georg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> > statement:
> >
> > Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> statement:
>
> Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
Perl? Larry who?
(I've been going to a hypnotherapist who specializes in erasing bad
memories of the past, sorry.)
James Stroud wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> >>statement:
> >>
> >>Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
> >>
> >>In the stat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> statement:
>
> Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
>
> In the state of the onion address?
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2006/09/21/
Terry Reedy wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
>>statement:
>>
>>Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
>>
>>In the state of the onion address?
>>
>>http://www
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
> statement:
>
> Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
>
> In the state of the onion address?
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2006/09/21/o
Did anyone else crack up when Larry Wall described python with the
statement:
Python, as the "anti-Perl," is heavily invested in maintaining Order.
In the state of the onion address?
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2006/09/21/onion.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>>> "Ed" == Ed Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ed> Go to the wiki, make the changes you want, and feel good about
> Ed> yourself for once.
>
> +1 QOTW.
I suggest leaving off the "for onc
>>>>> "Ed" == Ed Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ed> Go to the wiki, make the changes you want, and feel good about
Ed> yourself for once.
+1 QOTW.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>>>> "Roy" == Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roy> There is much about traditional OO which translates well to Python,
Roy> but sometimes it is difficult to read a treatise on OO and tell
Roy> which bits are "traditional OO"
From: Leif Biberg Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 1, 2005 2:13:43 PM EDT
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: My personal candidate for QOTW (was: Python interpreter in Basic or a Python-2-Basic translator.)
Cameron Laird skrev:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Engi
must be
>>"safe." Any other development environments (such as Java, Perl,
> .
> .
> .
This is clear evidence supporting the theory that being in charge of
security and being able to think have no significant correlation.
And, yes: +1 QOTW from me, too.
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Cameron Laird wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Engineer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> >The security 'droids have decided that since the MS Office Suite is
a
> >"standard" application then software written in MS
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Engineer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>The security 'droids have decided that since the MS Office Suite is a
>"standard" application then software written in MS Office VBA must be
>"safe." A
"Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2005/01/20/getters-setters-fuxors
"...Many people coming to Python can't believe no one uses IDEs. The
automatic assumption is that Python is for old grey beards who are
comfortable with vi and
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2005/01/20/getters-setters-fuxors
"...Many people coming to Python can't believe no one uses IDEs. The
automatic assumption is that Python is for old grey beards who are
comfortable with vi and Emacs and refuse to accept breakthroughs in
programming productivity like IDE
39 matches
Mail list logo
