kj wrote:
I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python. I like Python
overall, but every once in a while I find myself trying to figure
out why Python does some things the way it does. At the moment
I'm scratching my head over Python's docstrings. As far as I
understand this is the standa
Wow. That was a great bunch of advice.
Thank you all very much!
Kynn
--
NOTE: In my address everything before the first period is backwards;
and the last period, and everything after it, should be discarded.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
kj:
> I have some functions
> that require a very long docstring to document, and somehow I find
> it a bit disconcerting to stick a few screenfuls of text between
> the top line of a function definition and its body.
You may put the main function(s) documentation in the docstring of the
module, a
kj a écrit :
(snip)
I think that sometimes even simple functions require a lot of
documentation. For example, I want to document a function that
takes a dictionary as argument, and this dictionary is expected to
have 5 keys. (When the number of mandatory arguments gets above
4, I find that it'
On Jun 8, 2:17 pm, kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python. I like Python
> overall, but every once in a while I find myself trying to figure
> out why Python does some things the way it does. At the moment
> I'm scratching my head over Python's docstrings
On Jun 8, 10:17 pm, kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python. I like Python
> overall, but every once in a while I find myself trying to figure
> out why Python does some things the way it does. At the moment
> I'm scratching my head over Python's docstring
kj wrote:
... I want to document a function that takes a dictionary as argument,
and this dictionary is expected to have 5 keys. When the number of mandatory
> arguments gets above 4, I find that it's too difficult to remember
> their order, so I resort to using a dictionary as the single argu
On Jun 9, 7:17 am, kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> For example, I want to document a function that
> takes a dictionary as argument, and this dictionary is expected to
> have 5 keys. (When the number of mandatory arguments gets above
> 4, I find that it's too difficult to remember their or
On Jun 8, 5:17 pm, kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python.
Welcome to the light, my son.
> I guess this is a rambling way to ask: are docstrings *it* as far
> Python documentation goes? Or is there a second, more flexible
> system?
You can define a de
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:17 PM, kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python. I like Python
> overall, but every once in a while I find myself trying to figure
> out why Python does some things the way it does. At the moment
> I'm scratching my head over P
I guess this is a rambling way to ask: are docstrings *it* as far
Python documentation goes? Or is there a second, more flexible
system?
Docstrings are it. Yet there are several ways how their content is
interpreted. Google for example epydoc. You can embed links that way.
I don't know perl,
I'm a Perlhead trying to learn the Way of Python. I like Python
overall, but every once in a while I find myself trying to figure
out why Python does some things the way it does. At the moment
I'm scratching my head over Python's docstrings. As far as I
understand this is the standard way to d
12 matches
Mail list logo