On 2014-04-02, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dan Sommers wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 02:19:38 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> These improvements are absolutely critical to the language, and should
>>> be made in Python 2.5.7, 2.6.9, and 3.0.2. Anyone using a newer
On 2/04/2014 3:42 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Python 2.8 is supported only on Windows XP 64-bit, and you
should upgrade to 32-bit Python
That would be Python 1.4
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Dan Sommers wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 02:19:38 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> These improvements are absolutely critical to the language, and should
>> be made in Python 2.5.7, 2.6.9, and 3.0.2. Anyone using a newer
>> version of Python is paying the price for
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 02:19:38 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> These improvements are absolutely critical to the language, and should
> be made in Python 2.5.7, 2.6.9, and 3.0.2. Anyone using a newer
> version of Python is paying the price for early adoption, and should
> back-level immediately to a
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:32 AM, bob gailer wrote:
> How about a "without" statement?
>
> without ]:
>
>
> Within the Any mention of any identifier in the list raises the
> specified or default (WithoutError) exception.
In the interests of anti-patterns, we should adopt converses to all
the cla
On 4/1/2014 4:20 AM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
April Fools =D
If you thought spaghetti code was bad, ...
in December, 1973 R. Lawrence Clark proposed a new programming
construct: COME FROM. See https://www.fortran.com/come_from.html
What can we do in this new age of GOTOless programming do to m
April Fools =D
Bye,
Skybuck =D
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
