On Dec 5, 4:18 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 7:34 am, BlueBird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 4:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> > > AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought peop
On Dec 5, 7:34 am, BlueBird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 4:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> > AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
> > interested in this:
>
> >http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
On Dec 4, 4:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
> interested in this:
>
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
> Marc
I find Ohloh comparisons also useful:
http://www.ohloh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
> interested in this:
>
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
> Marc
Real programmers use brainfuck.
Kidding of course, I believe someone sho
On Dec 4, 10:24 am, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool (assuming these numbers actually mean something), but this has
> more to do with Perl's fall than Python's
> increase:http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/Perl.html.
I'd say that's even better news.
> Even more amazing is the rate C
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone has an idea what the huge peak around the middle of 2004 can be
> attributed to?
There's a Q/A section at the bottom of
http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index which covers this:
Q: What happened to Java
On 12/4/07, Daniel Fetchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well we Python folks are spoiled but for most people C++ counts as a
> > > high level language
> >
> > Well, some parts are high-level, but it's full of very
> > deep elevator shafts for you to accidentally fall
> > into...
> >
> > A tr
> > Well we Python folks are spoiled but for most people C++ counts as a
> > high level language
>
> Well, some parts are high-level, but it's full of very
> deep elevator shafts for you to accidentally fall
> into...
>
> A truly high-level language also *doesn't* have low
> level parts (or at leas
George Sakkis wrote:
> Well we Python folks are spoiled but for most people C++ counts as a
> high level language
Well, some parts are high-level, but it's full of very
deep elevator shafts for you to accidentally fall
into...
A truly high-level language also *doesn't* have low
level parts (or at
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 10:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> > AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
> > interested in this:
> >
> > http:/
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
But dreaded Ruby is coming up fast. Run Away! Run Away!
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
--
-- Lou Pecora
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 4, 11:07 am, Paul Rudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Even more amazing is the rate C++ is losing ground:
>> >http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/C__.html
>>
>> I don't really find surprising that low le
On Dec 4, 11:07 am, Paul Rudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Even more amazing is the rate C++ is losing ground:
> >http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/C__.html
>
> I don't really find surprising that low level languages lose ground at
> the expense of high
George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Even more amazing is the rate C++ is losing ground:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/C__.html
I don't really find surprising that low level languages lose ground at
the expense of higher level ones. The developer-time/run-time
trade-off tends to move
George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even more amazing is the rate C++ is losing ground:
> http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/C__.html
Given that the ratings are relative it may simply indicate that C++ is
standing still while the others run ahead.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On Dec 4, 10:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
> AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
> interested in this:
>
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
> Marc
Cool (assuming these numbers actually mean something),
This is *not* an attempt to start yet another Python-versus-
AnyOtherProgrammingLanguage flame war, but I thought people might be
interested in this:
http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
Marc
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
17 matches
Mail list logo