On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Robert wrote:
> > Can I install 2.7 and 3.2 side by side?
>
> Yes, of course. Just don't fiddle with the "System Python" (i.e. the
> copy preinstalled by Apple).
>
Good advice. I second it.
> You may wish
In article
,
Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Robert wrote:
> > Can I install 2.7 and 3.2 side by side?
>
> Yes, of course. Just don't fiddle with the "System Python" (i.e. the
> copy preinstalled by Apple).
> You may wish to install your additional Pythons via Fink or Ma
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Robert wrote:
> Can I install 2.7 and 3.2 side by side?
Yes, of course. Just don't fiddle with the "System Python" (i.e. the
copy preinstalled by Apple).
You may wish to install your additional Pythons via Fink or MacPorts.
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://mail.python.or
Can I install 2.7 and 3.2 side by side?
--
Robert
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You can use valgrind and attach it to python (in which you recompile python
for it...)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, nitroamos wrote:
> Hello --
>
> I'm a python noob, so I'm trying to figure out how to get access to
> the same data I'm used to from gprof, if possible. I was able to get
> cPy
Hello --
I'm a python noob, so I'm trying to figure out how to get access to
the same data I'm used to from gprof, if possible. I was able to get
cPython/Stats to work just fine... but I'm disappointed with the lack
of detail in the output... Is there a better way?
For example, OSX has the nice S
