Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>>
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
find usefull. I then would feel no problem "burdening" those users
with the sa
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
>> find usefull. I then would feel no problem "burdening" those users
>> with the same
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Well if it comes so far I have to consult a lawyer I'd rather not publish
it in the first place.
Then take the (free) advice that you asked for.
I'll do that and I appreciate your time in giving it.
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>>
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attac
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
derivative
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:30:18 -0400, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Antoon Pardon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I see this as my contribution to the communities who has provided me
>> with all kinds of things that are usefull to me. I'm willing to p
"Antoon Pardon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I see this as my contribution to the communities who has provided me
> with all kinds of things that are usefull to me. I'm willing to put
> time into this,
Great. My human, non-lawyer advice, if I were to give it, wo
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>>Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
>>>doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
>>>derivative work.
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
derivative work.
Why attach a license that is not operative. That doesn't make sense
to
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>>
>>>
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulti
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
to want t
Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
>> code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
>> to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
>> to want that de
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
to want that derived work uses the same license.
No, the PSF does not want that. It doe
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 09:51, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> It seems I have to include the following in
> my code:
>
> "Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Python Software Foundation;
>All Rights Reserved"
>
> Do I understand correctly?
You are of course allowed to *add* your own copyright statement:
"Copy
Op 2005-04-12, Steve Holden schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
>> with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
>> tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
>> to me how I can do this in acco
Antoon Pardon wrote:
I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
to me how I can do this in accordance with the python
license.
First of all it seems I have to make a
I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
to me how I can do this in accordance with the python
license.
First of all it seems I have to make a sumary of how
my mod
19 matches
Mail list logo
