On Sep 23, 7:03 pm, Matt Joiner wrote:
> how do you get the call stacks like this?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Atherun wrote:
> > On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Nobody wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:59:12 +0100, Nobody wrote:
> >> >> kernel32.dll!WaitForSingleObject+0x12
> >> >> p
how do you get the call stacks like this?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Atherun wrote:
> On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Nobody wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:59:12 +0100, Nobody wrote:
>> >> kernel32.dll!WaitForSingleObject+0x12
>> >> python26.dll!_Py_svnversion+0xcf8
>>
>> > I haven't a clue how thi
On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Nobody wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:59:12 +0100, Nobody wrote:
> >> kernel32.dll!WaitForSingleObject+0x12
> >> python26.dll!_Py_svnversion+0xcf8
>
> > I haven't a clue how this happens. _Py_svnversion just returns a string:
>
> In retrospect, I think that's a red herring. 0
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:59:12 +0100, Nobody wrote:
>> kernel32.dll!WaitForSingleObject+0x12
>> python26.dll!_Py_svnversion+0xcf8
>
> I haven't a clue how this happens. _Py_svnversion just returns a string:
In retrospect, I think that's a red herring. 0xcf8 seems like too large an
offset for such
On Sep 23, 7:58 am, Atherun wrote:
> On Sep 23, 12:08 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nobody wrote:
> > > It doesn't even
>
> > You intrigue me, sir. Does it odd?
>
> > What is the remainder of this aborted sentence?
>
> > ChrisA
>
> That is odd, I also find it o
On Sep 23, 12:08 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nobody wrote:
> > It doesn't even
>
> You intrigue me, sir. Does it odd?
>
> What is the remainder of this aborted sentence?
>
> ChrisA
That is odd, I also find it odd that it deadlocks the entire python
system, even t
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nobody wrote:
> It doesn't even
>
You intrigue me, sir. Does it odd?
What is the remainder of this aborted sentence?
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:19:28 -0700, Atherun wrote:
>> I suggest obtaining a copy of Process Explorer, and using it to
>> investigate the state of both processes (but especially the child) at the
>> point that the "deadlock" seems to occur.
>
> In the one case I can easily reproduce, its in a p4.e
On Sep 22, 10:44 am, Nobody wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:55:40 -0700, Atherun wrote:
> >> Just handle process.stdout/stderr by yourself - read it out until EOF
> >> and then wait() for the process.
>
> > Thats what confuses me though, the documentation says
> > process.stdout.read()/stderr.read
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:55:40 -0700, Atherun wrote:
>> Just handle process.stdout/stderr by yourself - read it out until EOF
>> and then wait() for the process.
>
> Thats what confuses me though, the documentation says
> process.stdout.read()/stderr.read() can deadlock and apparently so can
> comm
On Sep 22, 12:24 am, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 22.09.2011 05:42 schrieb Atherun:
>
> > I'm pretty sure thats the problem, this is a generic catch all
> > function for running subprocesses. It can be anything to a simple
> > command to a complex command with a ton of output. I'm looking for a
> >
Am 22.09.2011 05:42 schrieb Atherun:
I'm pretty sure thats the problem, this is a generic catch all
function for running subprocesses. It can be anything to a simple
command to a complex command with a ton of output. I'm looking for a
better solution to handle the case of running subprocesses
On Sep 21, 8:58 pm, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Chris Rebert wrote:
>
> > Popen.poll():
> > Check if child process has terminated. Set **and return**
> > returncode attribute.
> > [Direct quote from the docs; emphasis added]
>
> Doh. I read right past that and didn't see it. Thanks f
In article ,
Chris Rebert wrote:
> Popen.poll():
> Check if child process has terminated. Set **and return**
> returncode attribute.
> [Direct quote from the docs; emphasis added]
Doh. I read right past that and didn't see it. Thanks for the
correction.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> My reading of the docs
> (http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.7/library/subprocess.html#popen-objec
> ts) says that Popen.poll() doesn't return a value, it sets the object's
> return code attribute, which you can then interrogate.
Popen.poll():
On Sep 21, 8:33 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Atherun wrote:
> > This is on windows with python 2.6.
> > I can't seem to remove a possibility of a deadlock in one of my
> > scripts at the moment. Its not a constant deadlock but it appears
> > from time to time. The
In article
<098f3d78-85f5-44e7-ba72-f2270a24d...@o9g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
Atherun wrote:
> This is on windows with python 2.6.
> I can't seem to remove a possibility of a deadlock in one of my
> scripts at the moment. Its not a constant deadlock but it appears
> from time to time. The c
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Atherun wrote:
> This is on windows with python 2.6.
> I can't seem to remove a possibility of a deadlock in one of my
> scripts at the moment. Its not a constant deadlock but it appears
> from time to time. The code is below:
>
> try:
>
> process =
> sub
This is on windows with python 2.6.
I can't seem to remove a possibility of a deadlock in one of my
scripts at the moment. Its not a constant deadlock but it appears
from time to time. The code is below:
try:
process =
subprocess.Popen(cmd,stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stderr=subprocess.STDOU
19 matches
Mail list logo
