7:28 AM
To: 'Eryk Sun'
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to
source code
Is this what you'd recommend doing when distributing a cython-generated code
compiled with cl. I want to distribute this in a windows or other o
MRAB wrote:
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris
wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
: 'python-list@python.org'
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
Yea, thanks a lot. That makes sense. I was testing it on my development
environment and got it to work that way, but I need to package it and test it
on my dual boot "user&
From: Eryk Sun
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 8:06 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH
&
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH to
> sitepackages:
In most cases an application should be isolated from PYTHON*
environment variables. If you're creating a Python application or
embedding Python in an application, use the embed
'
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
I downloaded VS community 2022 and I know how to access the developer command
prompt. I'm using the one called x64 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022
I ran a comman
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
I'm wait
arrys-emacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz <[3]jsch...@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Eryk Sun <[4]eryk...@gmail.com>; [5]python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access
to source cod
4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: Eryk Sun ; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
> On 4 Apr 2023, at 16:28, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Where can I download that cl program? I've used gcc before, but I hear
o C++.
Once you have that installed there are bat files that setup environment in the
terminal.
Then you can use cl, nmake etc
Barry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eryk Sun
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 12:55 PM
> To: Jim Schwartz
> Cc: python-list@python.org
> S
z
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my sou
On 4/1/2023 5:24 AM, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 20:24, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
> GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really
> understand licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with
> my worry abo
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license I pick. I’m not selling it now so it doesn’
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 13:16, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> > service [...]
>
> You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser
On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> service [...]
You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser runs
it every time you use the service (and probably while you aren't using
the servic
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 10:34, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Yea. You’re right. I probably need a lawyer someday. Thanks.
>
If your needs are basic, you shouldn't need a lawyer. Copyright law
and treaties DO protect you. But it's important to be aware that no
amount of legal protection - whether you hire
r who
> practices in this field.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Python-list On
>> Behalf Of Chris Angelico
>> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
>> To: python-list@python.org
>> Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
phone apps
developers include with their apps. And it would be good to consult a
lawyer who practices in this field.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python s
What license do I have to choose so people can't use my code? I don't know
this stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Cython can compile a script to C source code for a module or
executable (--embed). The source can be compiled and link
On 31/03/2023 13:00, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Others have commented that at some level it will always be thre but on a
more pragmatic level tools like py2
On 3/31/2023 10:14 AM, jkn wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source cod
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> > python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
>
>
>
> Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze, but that has the
> source code avail
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze, but that has the
source code available. So does pyinstaller. I think gcc does, too.
Does
On 2018-06-07 22:40, Daniel Glus wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the entire list of possible encodings for a Python
> source file - that is, encodings that can go in a PEP 263
> <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/> encoding specification, like #
> -*- encoding: foo
On 6/7/18 4:40 PM, Daniel Glus wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the entire list of possible encodings for a Python
> source file - that is, encodings that can go in a PEP 263
> <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/> encoding specification, like #
> -*- encoding: foo -*
On 6/7/2018 4:40 PM, Daniel Glus wrote:
I'm trying to figure out the entire list of possible encodings for a Python
source file - that is, encodings that can go in a PEP 263
<https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/> encoding specification, like #
-*- encoding: foo -*-.
For n
Daniel Glus writes:
> I'm trying to figure out the entire list of possible encodings for a Python
> source file - that is, encodings that can go in a PEP 263
> <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/> encoding specification, like #
> -*- encoding: foo -*-.
What
I'm trying to figure out the entire list of possible encodings for a Python
source file - that is, encodings that can go in a PEP 263
<https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/> encoding specification, like #
-*- encoding: foo -*-.
Is this list the same as the list given in the docume
On 22/03/17 21:57, M. R.P. wrote:
does anyone know were I can [find?] python source code programs?
Are you looking for the source to a Python language implementation
itself? If so, see this link:
https://www.python.org/downloads/
If not, what are you looking for, exactly? What sort of
On 03/22/2017 05:57 PM, M. R.P. wrote:
does anyone know were I can python source code programs?
The source code for cpython (i.e. the most common interpreter) can be
found here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/source/
https://github.com/python/cpython
Unless you mean the
does anyone know were I can python source code programs?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 9/10/2016 11:27 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 01:04 am, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
I ran hg fetch to update the CPython repo.
I use pull (to local repository) and update (working directory)
separately in the following script (pull.bat), based on either the
devguide or what Tor
On 2016-09-10 15:27:07 +, Steve D'Aprano said:
Never mind. I got bored and frustrated and Ctrl-C'ed the process and ran it
again. This time it took about 15 seconds to complete.
Out of curiosity I checked for python debugger with "attach" feature
(aking to gdb/lldb) and I found a few but
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 01:04 am, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> I ran hg fetch to update the CPython repo.
>
> It has been stuck on "adding changesets" for half an hour. I don't know if
> that's because the process has locked up, or because there really are that
> many new changesets and it will simply tak
I ran hg fetch to update the CPython repo.
It has been stuck on "adding changesets" for half an hour. I don't know if
that's because the process has locked up, or because there really are that
many new changesets and it will simply take a long time to process them.
(With the 3.6 beta just around
t. I've searched for Python documentation that
> covers max Python source (*.py) and compiled file (*.pyc) sizes without
> success. Any tips on where to look for this information?
>
> Background: Python 3.5.1 on Linux.
I don't know if/where this is documented, but ther
> Heh, great question, and I'm curious too! But one place to get a bit more
> info is the standard library.
>
> rosuav@sikorsky:~/cpython/Lib$ find -name \*.py|xargs ls -lS|head
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rosuav rosuav 624122 Jul 17 17:38 ./pydoc_data/topics.py
Brilliant! :)
Thanks Chris!
Malcolm
--
http
t we
> need to be concerned about. I've searched for Python documentation that
> covers max Python source (*.py) and compiled file (*.pyc) sizes without
> success. Any tips on where to look for this information?
Heh, great question, and I'm curious too! But one place to get a bit
more i
at
covers max Python source (*.py) and compiled file (*.pyc) sizes without
success. Any tips on where to look for this information?
Background: Python 3.5.1 on Linux.
Thank you,
Malcolm
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 12:01:10 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> I remember seeing here (couple of weeks ago??) a mention of a regex
> debugging/editing tool hidden away in the python source tree.
>
> Does someone remember the name/path?
>
> There are of course doz
I remember seeing here (couple of weeks ago??) a mention of a regex
debugging/editing tool hidden away in the python source tree.
Does someone remember the name/path?
There are of course dozens of online ones...
Looking for a python native tool
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
llows:
1) The *solution* is to fix the audit process.
2) But here's one of several *work-arounds*.
It may well be impossible to truly solve the problem, and I'm aware of
that. But sometimes you need to point out that a pyc-only distribution
is still distributing something very VER
On 29.09.2014 16:53, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
>>> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they
>>> only know this project as an Excel add-in.
>>>
>>> Now, internal audit tak
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Dan Stromberg :
>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>>> Yes. Distribute the pyc files only.
>>
>> Yes, this is the way it's usually done.
>
> Has the .pyc file format stabilized? A decade ago, my employer shipped
> an application as .pyc files but had to
On 10/2/2014 1:17 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Dan Stromberg :
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano
Yes. Distribute the pyc files only.
Yes, this is the way it's usually done.
Has the .pyc file format stabilized?
No. The cache files are binary specific and are so labelled. x.py
Dan Stromberg :
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>> Yes. Distribute the pyc files only.
>
> Yes, this is the way it's usually done.
Has the .pyc file format stabilized? A decade ago, my employer shipped
an application as .pyc files but had to ship the matching CPython binary
wit
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> norman.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello list
>>
>> Python 3.4 applies.
>>
>> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
>> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they
>> only know this
Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
>> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they
>> only know this project as an Excel add-in.
>>
>> Now, internal audit takes exception in some cases if users are able to
>>
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Another possibility is to distribute your modules inside a zip file. See
> here:
>
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2014-July/675506.html
>
> Such zip files are not just runnable, but also importable. Depending on your
> Excel requirements, you might need
norman.i...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello list
>
> Python 3.4 applies.
>
> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they
> only know this project as an Excel add-in.
>
> Now, internal audit takes excep
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> It ought to be possible to do an AST reconstitution for at least part
> of this. I can hunt down some of my PEP 463 test code to help out with
> that. It should be possible to figure out what names are local, and
> then just use those.
>
> I
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:41 PM, wrote:
> Crunching the source is an interesting idea that could achieve that end, but
> it seems fraught with problems like maintaining consistency between renaming
> objects in a module and renaming where imports happen.
>
Here's a technique that you could use
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:36:47 -0700, norman.ives wrote:
> Hello list
>
> Python 3.4 applies.
>
> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they
> only know this project as an Excel add-in.
>
> Now,
Thanks for the reply!
I'm not concerned about hiding the source code in a fundamental way. The
condition that needs to be satisfied is that independent validators (in the
organisation) must not "have access" to the source code.
Crunching the source is an interesting idea that could achieve that
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:36 PM, wrote:
> I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
> organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they only
> know this project as an Excel add-in.
>
> Now, internal audit takes exception in some cases if users
Hello list
Python 3.4 applies.
I have a project that involves distributing Python code to users in an
organisation. Users do not interact directly with the Python code; they only
know this project as an Excel add-in.
Now, internal audit takes exception in some cases if users are able to see th
On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:17:10 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/05/2014 07:31, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence
>> wrote:
>>> On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
>>> That's good to know, it'll
On 26/05/2014 07:31, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
This seems like an unnecessarily harsh w
Ben Finney, 26.05.2014 05:20:
> bookaa bookaa writes:
>> Generally, people consider Python as a script language.
>> It has high development efficiency
>> but run too slowly
>
> Which Python implementation are you talking about? Run time is not a
> property of the language. It is a property of the
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
>>
>
> That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
This seems like an unnecessarily harsh way of putting it, Mark. Could
you be le
property of the language. It is a property of the language
implementation.
> interpret running, and can not compile.
Python is always compiled in order to run. The process of turning Python
source into Python bytecode *is* compilation.
> It depends to Python environment, can not employ alone
On 25/05/2014 12:02, mm0fmf wrote:
On 25/05/2014 11:24, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
OT:
Mark, you've been pro-Python3 enough in your recent postings
On 25/05/2014 11:24, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
OT:
Mark, you've been pro-Python3 enough in your recent postings you have
forced me to act. I've ju
On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is fr
bookaa bookaa, 25.05.2014 10:17:
> I think the significance of Python to Go, is it give us opportunity to
> make Python project run fast.
You shouldn't make that your only goal, because you'll have a really hard
time achieving it (to put it mildly).
Stefan
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/l
ance like? Presumably significantly better than
>> CPython, as that's what you're boasting here. Have you run a
>> standardized benchmark? How do the numbers look?
>
> I must admit that after automaticaly convert Python source to Go, compile
> to EXE, the running speed is ju
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, bookaa wrote:
>
> > This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source
> > to Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executabl
My opinions about Go.
i) go build XXX that creates an exe, one can put on
a usb stick and run (distribute) it, is a feature hard
to beat.
I do not know, if it will be rendered correctly.
D:\jm\jmgo>hello3.exe
ASCII abcde xyz
Germanäöü ÄÖÜ ß
Polishąęźżńł
Russian абвгдеж эюя
CJK
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, bookaa bookaa wrote:
> This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source to
> Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable binary.
> (btw: Go is a new C-like compilable language, open source).
&g
Make Python Compilable
This tool can be called 'Python to GoLang', which translate Python source to
Golang source. And then you can compile the Go files to executable binary.
(btw: Go is a new C-like compilable language, open source).
Generally, people consider Python as a script la
On 18 January 2014 08:31, Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 17 January 2014 00:58, Sam wrote:
> > I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof
> as long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
> >
> > Is it possible to protect python source code by compil
On 17 January 2014 00:58, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as
> long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
>
> Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
> Does .pyo offer better protection?
If
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:58:48 -0800, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof
> as long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
What makes you think that "pirates" will be the least bit interested in
your code? No offence intended, I&#
On 01/16/2014 05:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sam wrote:
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sam wrote:
> I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as
> long as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
>
> Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
> Does .pyo offer better pro
Sam writes:
> I would like to protect my python source code.
Protect it from what? If there's some specific activity you want to
prevent or restrict, please say what it is, since “protect” is a rather
loaded term.
> It need not be foolproof as long as it adds inconvenience to pirate
On 1/16/14 7:58 PM, Sam wrote:
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does .pyo offer better protection?
First, .pyc and .pyo are
I would like to protect my python source code. It need not be foolproof as long
as it adds inconvenience to pirates.
Is it possible to protect python source code by compiling it to .pyc or .pyo?
Does .pyo offer better protection?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jabba Laci wrote:
> As a university project, I would like to work on an automated
> converter that transforms a Python source code to C++ or Java (not yet
> decided but I would vote on Java since it seems less complicated).
> Do you know if it's already done? What other similar
at 2:19 AM, Jabba Laci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a university project, I would like to work on an automated
> converter that transforms a Python source code to C++ or Java (not yet
> decided but I would vote on Java since it seems less complicated).
> Do you know if it's alre
Hi,
As a university project, I would like to work on an automated
converter that transforms a Python source code to C++ or Java (not yet
decided but I would vote on Java since it seems less complicated).
Do you know if it's already done? What other similar projects are you aware of?
And
Jayden於 2012年9月28日星期五UTC+8下午7時57分14秒寫道：
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
> that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really
> the case? Any way to protect your source code?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
On 9/28/2012 9:19 AM, stu...@molden.no wrote:
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among man
kl. 16:38:10 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jerry Hill følgende:
> This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
Neither of them are very "obfuscated".
> In general though, why does it matter?
Paranoia among managers?
> What are you trying to protect y
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:18 AM, wrote:
> Python bytecode is not easier to hack than Java or .NET bytecodes.
This is true, but both java and .net are also relatively easy to decompile.
In general though, why does it matter? What are you trying to protect
yourself against? If you're including
kl. 13:57:14 UTC+2 fredag 28. september 2012 skrev Jayden følgende:
> Dear All, I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
> told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it
> really the case? Any way to protect your source code? Thanks a lot! J
On 09/28/2012 02:17 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone
told me that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code.
Is it really the case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks
On 28/09/2012 12:57, Jayden wrote:
Dear All,
I have a concern in developing commercial code with Python. Someone told me
that its program can be easily hacked to get its source code. Is it really the
case? Any way to protect your source code?
Thanks a lot!
Jayden
This question has been as
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> gmspro wrote:
> > Why is python source code not available on github?
Why should every free software project be available on a single proprietary
platform?
Also, see:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/03/hacker-commandeers-github-to-pro
gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/121885/focus=122111
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gmspro, 24.06.2012 02:16:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source code.
github != git.
You can use git to work on the sources if you wish. Just install a
Mercurial plugin for it and clone the code
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:34 AM, gmspro wrote:
>
> No,
> I can download as .tar.bz2, but i'm talking about using git.
> git clone, git add ., git commit -a, git push is easier to keep track of
> my code. Then for git pull request.
Mercurial can do all that. I'm not as familiar with it as I am wi
No,
I can download as .tar.bz2, but i'm talking about using git.
git clone, git add ., git commit -a, git push is easier to keep track of my
code. Then for git pull request.
--- On Sat, 6/23/12, George Silva wrote:
From: George Silva
Subject: Re: Why is python source code not availab
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:16 AM, gmspro wrote:
>
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
It's done with Mercurial, not git, but the same can be done:
hg clone http://hg.python
On 6/23/2012 7:16 PM, gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
If you mean CPython, it's because the devs use Mercurial and have their
own hosting on python.org.
hg clone http://hg.python.org/cpython
http://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html
github is far from
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.3/Python-2.7.3.tar.bz2
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, gmspro wrote:
> Why is python source code not available on github?
>
> Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source
> code.
>
> --
> http://mail.python
Why is python source code not available on github?
Make it available on github so that we can git clone and work on source code.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
