Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-12 Thread Travis Parks
On Nov 8, 12:09 am, Lie Ryan wrote: > On 11/08/2011 01:21 PM, Travis Parks wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 12:44 pm, John Gordon  wrote: > >> In  John Gordon  writes: > > >>> In<415d875d-bc6d-4e69-bcf8-39754b450...@n18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>   > >>> Travis Parks  writes: > Which web framewo

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-08 Thread Dave Angel
On 11/08/2011 02:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Lie Ryan wrote: I much prefer the "everything's an object" notion. C's array literals are just as weird (although in C, you can directly dereference a literal character array - "ABCDEFG"[note_idx] will give you a note

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Lie Ryan wrote: > IMO, Python has a much nicer choice of built-in data structure for data > processing. Python has a much more mature object-orientation, e.g. I prefer > writing l.append(x) rather than array_push(l, x). I think these qualities > are what makes you t

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-07 Thread Lie Ryan
On 11/08/2011 01:21 PM, Travis Parks wrote: On Nov 7, 12:44 pm, John Gordon wrote: In John Gordon writes: In<415d875d-bc6d-4e69-bcf8-39754b450...@n18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> Travis Parks writes: Which web frameworks have people here used and which have they found to be: scalable, RAD

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-07 Thread Travis Parks
On Nov 7, 12:44 pm, John Gordon wrote: > In John Gordon writes: > > > In <415d875d-bc6d-4e69-bcf8-39754b450...@n18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> > > Travis Parks writes: > > > Which web frameworks have people here used and which have they found > > > to be: scalable, RAD compatible, performant, st

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-07 Thread John Gordon
In John Gordon writes: > In <415d875d-bc6d-4e69-bcf8-39754b450...@n18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> Travis > Parks writes: > > Which web frameworks have people here used and which have they found > > to be: scalable, RAD compatible, performant, stable and/or providing > > good community support?

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-07 Thread John Gordon
In <415d875d-bc6d-4e69-bcf8-39754b450...@n18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> Travis Parks writes: > Which web frameworks have people here used and which have they found > to be: scalable, RAD compatible, performant, stable and/or providing > good community support? I am really trying to get as much fe

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-05 Thread Travis Parks
On Nov 5, 4:11 pm, Travis Parks wrote: > Hello: > > A new guy showed up at work a few weeks ago and has started talking > about replacing a 6 month old project, written in ASP.NET MVC, with an > open source solution that can handle massive scaling. I think his > primary concern is the "potential"

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-05 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Travis Parks wrote: > Finally, I wanted to ask whether anyone has tried having Django call > out to Python 3 routines. I am okay using Python 2.7 in Django, if I > can have the controllers call business logic implemented in Python 3, > accepting POPOs from the data

Re: Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-05 Thread Marco Nawijn
On Nov 5, 9:11 pm, Travis Parks wrote: > Hello: > > A new guy showed up at work a few weeks ago and has started talking > about replacing a 6 month old project, written in ASP.NET MVC, with an > open source solution that can handle massive scaling. I think his > primary concern is the "potential"

Python ORMs Supporting POPOs and Substituting Layers in Django

2011-11-05 Thread Travis Parks
Hello: A new guy showed up at work a few weeks ago and has started talking about replacing a 6 month old project, written in ASP.NET MVC, with an open source solution that can handle massive scaling. I think his primary concern is the "potential" need for massive web farms in the future. In order