On Thursday 16 June 2016 14:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 2:19:33 AM UTC+12, MRAB wrote:
>
>> Coincidentally, there was recently a discussion on the python-dev list
>> about whether to switch to C99.
>
> Only slightly less than a generation after it came out...
On 2016-06-15 14:38, cjw wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 23:57:20 UTC-4, Ned Deily wrote:
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6 release
team, I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.0a2.
3.6.0a2 is the first of four planned alpha releases of Python 3.6,
th
On Monday, 13 June 2016 23:57:20 UTC-4, Ned Deily wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6 release
> team, I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.0a2.
> 3.6.0a2 is the first of four planned alpha releases of Python 3.6,
> the next major release of Pyt
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.6 release
team, I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 3.6.0a2.
3.6.0a2 is the first of four planned alpha releases of Python 3.6,
the next major release of Python. During the alpha phase, Python 3.6
remains under heavy devel
