Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-11 Thread Tim Roberts
Michael Torrie wrote: > >That's really interesting. I looked briefly at the page. How does your >python extension work with xywrite? Does it manipulate xywrite >documents or does it tie in at runtime with Xywrite somehow? If so, how >does it do this? Crossing the divide into a 16-bit app is p

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K

2014-10-08 Thread Pal Acreide
Here's another quick one -- under 30 secs. -- and then I'll revert to lurker status. It's one of my favorites: "Veritas" wine & liquor search. (Teetotalers, avert your eyes.) http://youtu.be/jDtm4z7kqyI Pal A. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-08 Thread Pal Acreide
random832 wrote on Tue Oct 7 22:33:23 CEST 2014 >On Tue, Oct 7, 2014, at 16:27, Michael Torrie wrote: >>That's really interesting. I looked briefly at the page. How does your python extension work with xywrite? Does it manipulate xywrite >>documents >>or does it tie in at runtime with Xyw

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-07 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/07/2014 02:33 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014, at 16:27, Michael Torrie wrote: >> That's really interesting. I looked briefly at the page. How does your >> python extension work with xywrite? Does it manipulate xywrite >> documents or does it tie in at runtime with X

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-07 Thread random832
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014, at 16:27, Michael Torrie wrote: > That's really interesting. I looked briefly at the page. How does your > python extension work with xywrite? Does it manipulate xywrite > documents or does it tie in at runtime with Xywrite somehow? If so, how > does it do this? Crossing t

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-07 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/05/2014 06:04 PM, Pal Acreide wrote: > BTW, the reason I run VBox is that I belong to a group of diehard > users of the classic DOS word-processor XyWrite. I've devised a way > to use Python as an extension of XyWrite's built-in Programming > Language (XPL): http://users.datarealm.com/xywwweb

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-07 Thread Carl Distefano
Tim G.: > Of course, if you're happy to work with a slightly older > version of Python, such as 3.2, then you should be fine. Well, I just installed 3.2.5 in W2K and all of my "stuff" seems to work. I'm a happy camper. Many thanks for the information and link! ChrisA: > Wow. I wonder, since you

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-06 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Pal Acreide wrote: > BTW, the reason I run VBox is that I belong to a group of diehard users of > the classic DOS word-processor XyWrite. I've devised a way to use Python as > an extension of XyWrite's built-in Programming Language (XPL): > http://users.datarealm.c

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-06 Thread Tim Golden
On 06/10/2014 01:04, Pal Acreide wrote: > Hi, I'm a lurker here and enjoy the back-and-forth, especially among the > experts among you. > > My question is this: I have Python 3.4.1 installed on 64-bit Win 7 Home > Premium, and on 32-bit Win 7 Pro running on a virtual machine (Oracle > VirtualBox)

Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

2014-10-06 Thread Pal Acreide
Hi, I'm a lurker here and enjoy the back-and-forth, especially among the experts among you. My question is this: I have Python 3.4.1 installed on 64-bit Win 7 Home Premium, and on 32-bit Win 7 Pro running on a virtual machine (Oracle VirtualBox). Now I'm trying to install it on Windows 2000 P