Benjamin wrote:
On Jul 11, 3:06 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Python 3 gets
actually released (nobody can say for sure how the
Ben Finney wrote:
So, in summary, despite the appearance of the "Python 3.0" page on the
wiki, there's really no single clearing-house source of Python 3.0
information that is maintained. The interested party needs to know a
half-dozen different resources to find out what's changing, and none
John Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> library changes are all listed in PEP 3008.
I assume you mean PEP 3108, "Standard Library Reorganization"
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/>.
--
\ “I have one rule to live by: Don't make it worse.” —Hazel |
`\
John Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 11, 6:26 am, Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jul 11, 3:06 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Is there a better information source, then, for the current
> > > state of what's expected in Python 3.0?
> >
> > Look at the deve
Ben Finney wrote:
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Python 3 gets
actually released (nobody can say for sure how the release will
look like in all details).
Is there a b
On Jul 11, 6:26 am, Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 3:06 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
>
> > > All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Py
On Jul 11, 3:06 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
>
> > All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Python 3 gets
> > actually released (nobody can say for sure how the r
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
>
> All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Python 3 gets
> actually released (nobody can say for sure how the release will
> look like in all details).
Is there a better infor
> This is rather disappointing. Is that entire page suspect?
All documentation about Python 3 is suspect until Python 3 gets
actually released (nobody can say for sure how the release will
look like in all details).
Wiki pages, traditionally, are always suspect for incorrect
or outdated informat
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Can anyone see a reason to believe the above wiki page's statement
> > about the 'string' module being removed? More to the point, can
> > anyone see a reason why that statement should remain on that page?
>
> Removing string and mov
Ben Finney wrote:
Howdy all,
The Python wiki page states on its page for Python 3.0
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python3.0>, in the section for
"Standard Library Changes"
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python3.0#head-40dd57e6561cce0b209ef49f8ce86030c6313113>,
that the 'string' module is to be remo
Howdy all,
The Python wiki page states on its page for Python 3.0
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python3.0>, in the section for
"Standard Library Changes"
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python3.0#head-40dd57e6561cce0b209ef49f8ce86030c6313113>,
that the 'string' module is to be removed.
It references PE
12 matches
Mail list logo
