Re: Python 3.0, 'Hello' < 42

Martin v. Löwis wrote: But the document also mentions that the result is not strictly "undefined" but "reproducable undetermined". What specific document are you looking at, and where specifically does it say that? I can't believe that the quotation marks indicate an actual quote, in particular

Re: Python 3.0, 'Hello' < 42

towit...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In the 3.0 changes list there is mentioned that "<"-compares are not supported anymore if the compared types are different (except numbers). Like 42 < "Hello" did return True of False depending on the implementation but is now a TypeError. But the document als

Re: Python 3.0, 'Hello' < 42

> But the document also mentions that the result is not strictly > "undefined" but "reproducable undetermined". What specific document are you looking at, and where specifically does it say that? I can't believe that the quotation marks indicate an actual quote, in particular because "reproducible

Python 3.0, 'Hello' < 42

Hello, In the 3.0 changes list there is mentioned that "<"-compares are not supported anymore if the compared types are different (except numbers). Like 42 < "Hello" did return True of False depending on the implementation but is now a TypeError. But the document also mentions that the result i