"Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| >
| >
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
| >
|
"Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| >
| >
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
| >
|
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:47:49 -0700, Ninereeds wrote:
> On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2.6, I have read, have optional 'Py3' warnings, and a 2to3 conversion
>> program
>
> The tools can work out the *intent* of any particular division
> operator? Can work out wheth
On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
>
> IDLE 3.0a3>>> 1/2
>
> 0.5
>
> | I realise that the new integer division semantics have
"Ninereeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
IDLE 3.0a3
>>> 1/2
0.5
| I realise that the new integer division semantics have been available
| in "from __future__" for quite a few years now, but a warni
Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
I realise that the new integer division semantics have been available
in "from __future__" for quite a few years now, but a warning might be
appropriate now that Python 3 is in alpha. A lot of people have
probably either forgotten, o
