On Oct 7, 2:29 am, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 7:02 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> fuzzyman wrote:
> >>> Doesn't sound like a particularly *good* solution to me. :-)
> >> From what you posted, 'type object at' should work.
>
> > It's stil
Fuzzyman wrote:
On Oct 6, 7:02 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fuzzyman wrote:
Doesn't sound like a particularly *good* solution to me. :-)
From what you posted, 'type object at' should work.
It's still a hack...
I am sorry if I offended you by pointing out to you a quick and d
On Oct 6, 7:02 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 11:54 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Fuzzyman wrote:
> >>> Hello all,
> >>> I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
> >>> to fix some code breakage with Python 2.
Fuzzyman wrote:
On Oct 5, 11:54 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fuzzyman wrote:
Hello all,
I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
to fix some code breakage with Python 2.6.
I have some code that looks for the '__lt__' method on a class:
if hasattr(clr,
On Oct 6, 7:16 am, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
> > In 3.0, the test returns true because function attributes only get
> > wrapped when bound. In the meanwhile, " 'object' in repr(X.__lt__)"
> > should do it for you.
>
> This session should give you some hints h
On Oct 5, 11:54 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> > I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
> > to fix some code breakage with Python 2.6.
>
> > I have some code that looks for the '__lt__' method on a class:
>
> > if hasat
Terry Reedy wrote:
In 3.0, the test returns true because function attributes only get
wrapped when bound. In the meanwhile, " 'object' in repr(X.__lt__)"
should do it for you.
This session should give you some hints how to archive your goal :)
Have fun!
>>> import types
>>> class A(object):
Fuzzyman wrote:
Hello all,
I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
to fix some code breakage with Python 2.6.
I have some code that looks for the '__lt__' method on a class:
if hasattr(clr, '__lt__'):
However - in Python 2.6 object has grown a default implementat
On Oct 5, 8:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Valentino
Volonghi aka Dialtone) wrote:
> Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So how do I tell if the X.__lt__ is inherited from object? I can look
>
> I don't have python 2.6 installed so I can't try but what I think could
> work is:
>
> >>> class Foo(obje
Fuzzyman wrote:
Hello all,
I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
to fix some code breakage with Python 2.6.
I have some code that looks for the '__lt__' method on a class:
if hasattr(clr, '__lt__'):
However - in Python 2.6 object has grown a default implementat
Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how do I tell if the X.__lt__ is inherited from object? I can look
I don't have python 2.6 installed so I can't try but what I think could
work is:
>>> class Foo(object):
... def hello(self):
... pass
...
>>> class Bla(Foo):
... def hello
Hello all,
I may well be being dumb (it has happened before), but I'm struggling
to fix some code breakage with Python 2.6.
I have some code that looks for the '__lt__' method on a class:
if hasattr(clr, '__lt__'):
However - in Python 2.6 object has grown a default implementation of
'__lt__', s
12 matches
Mail list logo
