Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows

2006-10-25 Thread Dale Strickland-Clark
To paraphrase an applicant for a job vacancy we're currently filling when asked to give an example of their problem solving skills: A client had a problem with Windows XP on his laptop. I reformatted his hard disk and installed Red Hat. Problem solved. -- Dale Strickland-Clark Riverhall Systems

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread Istvan Albert
sturlamolden wrote: > Maybe someone have gone through the trouble and got a clear answer from > Microsoft. As far as companies go the EULA is as clear of an answer as you can possibly hope for. As for the original post, don't bother with it this issue, the chances that MS will start harassing yo

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread sturlamolden
Martin v. Löwis wrote: > As Fredrik Lundh says: Ask your lawyer. We cannot really interpret the > Microsoft license for you (I can only give it to you in case you don't > have it), and I can't formally give you permission to do copy something > that Microsoft has the copyright to. I wasn't askin

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread Martin v. Löwis
sturlamolden schrieb: > Is further "distribution" okay if it is only accompanied by the python > runtime DLL (as is the case when using Py2Exe) or should the entire > python-2.4.4.msi from python.org be "distributed"? As Fredrik Lundh says: Ask your lawyer. We cannot really interpret the Microsoft

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread manuelg
sturlamolden wrote: > I certainly don't understand the EULA, and thus I cannot make sure that > I lawyer understands it either. But I can certainly find a lawyer that > charges an hour and pretends to understand it. I am sure buying a > copy of VC7 is a lot cheaper. When you buy that copy of

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread sturlamolden
Fredrik Lundh wrote: I am not intentionally posting FUD. >"As long as you're using a standard Python build, you don't need to >buy VC7 to [legally redistribute the C runtime]. The python.org team >use a properly licensed VC7 to build Python, which turns Python into >"licensee sof

Re: Python's CRT licensing on Windows <-- FUD

2006-10-25 Thread Fredrik Lundh
sturlamolden wrote: > On Windows, the standard Python 2.4 distro is compiled with Microsoft > Visual C++ 2003 and is shipped with msvcr71.dll as a part of the binary > installer. That is ok, as those who has a license for Microsoft Visual > C++ 2003 is allowed to redistribute msvcr71.dll. With

Python's CRT licensing on Windows

2006-10-25 Thread sturlamolden
On Windows, the standard Python 2.4 distro is compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2003 and is shipped with msvcr71.dll as a part of the binary installer. That is ok, as those who has a license for Microsoft Visual C++ 2003 is allowed to redistribute msvcr71.dll. Without a license for Microsoft Visu