oyinbo55 wrote:
On Oct 1, 11:36 am, "Richard Brodie" wrote:
"oyinbo55" wrote in message
news:2feb36fc-106c-4d7c-a697-db59971dc...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
Using the standard 19200 baud results in gobbledegook from the
multimeter.
You aren't going to notice a 0.1% clock skew within 1
On Oct 1, 11:36 am, "Richard Brodie" wrote:
> "oyinbo55" wrote in message
>
> news:2feb36fc-106c-4d7c-a697-db59971dc...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Using the standard 19200 baud results in gobbledegook from the
> > multimeter.
>
> You aren't going to notice a 0.1% clock skew within 1 byt
"oyinbo55" wrote in message
news:2feb36fc-106c-4d7c-a697-db59971dc...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> Using the standard 19200 baud results in gobbledegook from the
> multimeter.
You aren't going to notice a 0.1% clock skew within 1 byte.
Forget about the difference between 19200 and 19230.
Hello all: this is my first post. I hope I'm doing it right.
I have a digital multimeter that sends data through an RS232 interface
at 19230 baud. I would like to record and graph the output in Python.
Pyserial does not want me to set the baudrate at a non-standard value:
>>>ser=serial.Serial('/de
