On Mar 23, 4:04 pm, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I needed to tweak it a bit to ignore the comments.. Namely this fixed
> it up..
>
> mainDict = dictOf(
> Group(Word(alphas)+Optional(quotedString)),
> Suppress("{") + attrDict + Suppress("}")
> ) | c
Il Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:11:16 -0700, rh0dium ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I am struggling with parsing the following data:
>
> test1 = """
> Technology {
> name= "gtc" dielectric
>= 2.75e-05 unitTimeName
On Mar 23, 1:48 pm, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 12:26 am, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > There are a couple of bugs in our program so far.
>
> > First of all, our grammar isn't parsing the METAL2 entry at all. We
> > should change this line:
>
> > md = ma
On Mar 23, 12:26 am, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a couple of bugs in our program so far.
>
> First of all, our grammar isn't parsing the METAL2 entry at all. We
> should change this line:
>
> md = mainDict.parseString(test1)
>
> to
>
> md = (mainDict+stringEnd).pars
On Mar 22, 9:11 pm, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> I am struggling with parsing the following data:
>
> test1 = """
> Technology {
> name = "gtc"
> dielectric = 2.75e-05
[...]
I know it's che
There are a couple of bugs in our program so far.
First of all, our grammar isn't parsing the METAL2 entry at all. We
should change this line:
md = mainDict.parseString(test1)
to
md = (mainDict+stringEnd).parseString(test1)
The parser is reading as far as it can, but then stopping onc
On Mar 22, 6:30 pm, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oof, I see that you have multiple "Layer" entries, with different
> qualifying labels. Since the dicts use "Layer" as the key, you only
> get the last "Layer" value, with qualifier "PRBOUNDARY", and lose the
> "Layer" for "METAL2". To
Oof, I see that you have multiple "Layer" entries, with different
qualifying labels. Since the dicts use "Layer" as the key, you only
get the last "Layer" value, with qualifier "PRBOUNDARY", and lose the
"Layer" for "METAL2". To fix this, you'll have to move the optional
alias term to the key, an
On Mar 22, 4:11 pm, rh0dium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am struggling with parsing the following data:
>
> As a side note: Is this the right approach to using pyparsing. Do we
> start from the inside and work our way out or should I have started
> with looking at the bigger pictur
Hi all,
I am struggling with parsing the following data:
test1 = """
Technology {
name= "gtc"
dielectric = 2.75e-05
unitTimeName= "ns"
timePrecision
10 matches
Mail list logo
