Francisco Borges wrote:
> I like PyX, use it a lot and would suggest it as a beter plotting
> library than the ones at Scipy (for as long as you don't need on-screen
> plotting).
FWIW, the plotting support in scipy is essentially unmaintained and abandoned,
since the advent of matplotlib. It has
Francisco Borges wrote:
> 1. it takes more lines of code (than what I fell is needed) to do it;
> 2. it (still) lacks easy ways to do frequent things (like filling)
Sorry, I just realised the piece of nonsense I just wrote...
PyX does fill objects very easily, what it does take lot's of work t
Robert Kern wrote:
> Matthias R. wrote:
> > Unfortunately matplotlib is only a 2D-plotting library.
> >
> > Do you know another one with 3D-capabilities as well?
>
> There's PyX.
Sorry, PyX can't do 3D plots.
---
I like PyX, use it a lot and would suggest it
