AW: Pure python standard library and License

2011-03-04 Thread Markus Schaber
LICENSE.txt - two of the differences are the Berkeley part, and the windows binary build part. This is just adding somewhat more confusion... Thanks, Markus Original Message: Betreff: Pure python standard library and License Hi, We want to include IronPython in one of our products, including the

AW: Pure python standard library and License

2011-03-04 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Terry, Von: Terry Reedy > Your interpretation seems reasonable, but only a paid lawyer (or ultimately a judge) can 'confirm' a legal interpretation. Sorry, we programmers generally hate the system. I also am a programmer, and not a lawyer. And our paid lawyer cannot look into the code (where

Re: Pure python standard library and License

2011-03-03 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/3/2011 11:39 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: Hi, We want to include IronPython in one of our products, including the pure Python part of the python standard library. It seems that the IronPython installer packagers simply copied the pure python part of the standard library (the directory tree of

Pure python standard library and License

2011-03-03 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, We want to include IronPython in one of our products, including the pure Python part of the python standard library. It seems that the IronPython installer packagers simply copied the pure python part of the standard library (the directory tree of .py files which is installed by cPython and