Re: Process "Killed"

2008-09-01 Thread dieter h
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Eric Wertman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets >> "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the >> word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few >> batch runs w

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-30 Thread Eric Wertman
> I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets > "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the > word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few > batch runs would only succeed with one or two files being processed > (out of 60) before t

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-29 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Glenn Hutchings wrote: Have you checked memory usage while your program is running? Your lines = f.readlines()[2:] statement will need almost twice the memory of your largest file. footnote: list objects contain references to string objects, not the strings themselves. the above tempo

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-29 Thread Fredrik Lundh
dieter wrote: Any Ideas? Is there a buffer limitation? Do you think it could be the filesystem? what does "ulimit -a" say? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-29 Thread Paul Boddie
On 28 Aug, 07:30, dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets > "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the > word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few > batch runs would only succeed with o

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-29 Thread Glenn Hutchings
dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets > "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the > word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few > batch runs would only succeed with one or two files be

Re: Process "Killed"

2008-08-28 Thread Matt Nordhoff
dieter wrote: > Hi, > > Overview > === > > I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets > "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the > word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few > batch runs would only succeed with one or t

Process "Killed"

2008-08-27 Thread dieter
Hi, Overview === I'm doing some simple file manipulation work and the process gets "Killed" everytime I run it. No traceback, no segfault... just the word "Killed" in the bash shell and the process ends. The first few batch runs would only succeed with one or two files being processed (out of