On 1 Aug 2005 06:50:23 -0700, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to scratch several people's itches.
Has anyone tried this doxygen filter: http://i31www.ira.uka.de/~baas/pydoxy/
I really like doxygen but am not sure if this is worth the trouble.
jw
--
http://mail.python.org/mailm
Bengt Richter wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2005 06:50:23 -0700, "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This seems to scratch several people's itches.
> >
> >Care to develop/maintain it ?
> >
> Are you talking to me? ;-)
>
> (My news server is having some problem. I saw my post on google groups
> but my n
Fuzzyman wrote:
> This seems to scratch several people's itches.
As I understand it it is something like generating "pythondoc" like javadoc?
Should be pretty easy to develop something a bit more polished than
Bengt's solution (or based on it of course) with maybe similar to
javadoc framesets f
On 1 Aug 2005 06:50:23 -0700, "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This seems to scratch several people's itches.
>
>Care to develop/maintain it ?
>
Are you talking to me? ;-)
(My news server is having some problem. I saw my post on google groups
but my normal news client isn't seeing it.)
Ass
This seems to scratch several people's itches.
Care to develop/maintain it ?
Regards,
Fuzzball
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 30 Jul 2005 11:08:29 -0700, "Kamilche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a large project that is getting complex, and I would like to
>print the docstrings without importing the modules. The only Python
>utility I could find references is apparently defunct and hasn't been
>updated in 4 years.
I have a large project that is getting complex, and I would like to
print the docstrings without importing the modules. The only Python
utility I could find references is apparently defunct and hasn't been
updated in 4 years.
I don't care how spartan the output is - it could look exactly like
pyth
