On 4/28/2017 1:01 PM, allen wade wrote:
is there a way to install python on a thumb drive
Check http://portablepython.com/
that does not require an
administrator's password? I have to use public computers and store all my
applications to the thumb drive, using the Portable Apps Platform to
is there a way to install python on a thumb drive that does not require an
administrator's password? I have to use public computers and store all my
applications to the thumb drive, using the Portable Apps Platform to manage
the applications.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
Were you able to solve this problem? I am also seeing this
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 at 2:22:19 PM UTC-4, lagu...@mail.com wrote:
> Portable Python 2.7 for Windows, the Python application have dependency on
> ssdeep-2.10, which is a binary exe.
>
> The ssdeep (libfuzzy) installa
ll it from source:
> ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/' "
> Although libmagic was installed using pip.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Peter Mawhorter
> Sent: 03/17/14 11:07 PM
> To: laguna-mc
> Subject: Re: Installing binwalk on Portable Pyth
Re: Installing ssdeep on Portable Python /advice
>
> On 3/21/14 9:51 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
> > On 3/20/14 7:16 PM, laguna...@mail.com wrote:
>
> >> $ tar -zxvf ssdeep-2.10.tar.gz
> >> $ cd ssdeep-2.10&& ./configure&& make&& sudo make inst
On 3/21/14 9:51 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
On 3/20/14 7:16 PM, laguna...@mail.com wrote:
$ tar -zxvf ssdeep-2.10.tar.gz
$ cd ssdeep-2.10&& ./configure&& make&& sudo make install
I need install it on PortablePython for Windows, so it's not
clear how to make this: where should be placed ssdeep
On 3/20/14 7:16 PM, laguna...@mail.com wrote:
$ tar -zxvf ssdeep-2.10.tar.gz
$ cd ssdeep-2.10&& ./configure&& make&& sudo make install
I need install it on PortablePython for Windows, so it's not
clear how to make this: where should be placed ssdeep Windows
binary files, that Pyt
On 21/03/2014 00:16, laguna...@mail.com wrote:
Portable Python 2.7 for Windows, the Python application have dependency on
ssdeep-2.10, which is a binary exe.
The ssdeep (libfuzzy) installation example was shown for Linux platform only:
a) libfuzzy can be installed via apt-get
Portable Python 2.7 for Windows, the Python application have dependency on
ssdeep-2.10, which is a binary exe.
The ssdeep (libfuzzy) installation example was shown for Linux platform only:
a) libfuzzy can be installed via apt-get:
$ sudo apt-get install libfuzzy2
b) to install
Portable Python 2.7 for Windows, the Python application have dependency on
ssdeep-2.10, which is a binary exe.
The ssdeep (libfuzzy) installation example was shown for Linux platform only:
a) libfuzzy can be installed via apt-get:
$ sudo apt-get install libfuzzy2
b) to install
alled using pip.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Mawhorter
Sent: 03/17/14 11:07 PM
To: laguna-mc
Subject: Re: Installing binwalk on Portable Python
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:58 PM, wrote: > I tried: pip
install "E:\Portable Python > 2.7.5.1\binwalk-1.3.0\src\setup.py" >
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:58 PM, wrote:
> I tried: pip install "E:\Portable Python
> 2.7.5.1\binwalk-1.3.0\src\setup.py"
>
> Error:
>
> E:\Portable Python 2.7.5.1\App\Scripts\pip run on 03/17/14 22:53:51
>
> Exception:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
&
I tried: pip install "E:\Portable Python 2.7.5.1\binwalk-1.3.0\src\setup.py"
Error:
E:\Portable Python 2.7.5.1\App\Scripts\pip run on 03/17/14 22:53:51
Exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "E:\Portable Python 2.7.5.1\App\lib\site-packages\pip\basecommand.py"
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
> Portable Python 2.7 for Win32 and installed on USB flash drive. I want
> install Binwalk tool, it have a few depencencies, I installed it first
> (numpy, matplotlib, libmagic, python-magic)
> Then I tried to install binwalk from locally s
Portable Python 2.7 for Win32 and installed on USB flash drive. I want install
Binwalk tool, it have a few depencencies, I installed it first (numpy,
matplotlib, libmagic, python-magic)
Then I tried to install binwalk from locally stored source archive file, I
tried two ways:
pip install E
bject: Re: Installing addition libraries in Portable Python 2.7 on Windows
On 16/03/2014 13:50, laguna...@mail.com wrote: > I am new in Python, I have
Portable Python 2.7.5.1 installed on Windows 7. > > I want to install
additional libraries: > > python-magic > libmagic >
On 16/03/2014 13:50, laguna...@mail.com wrote:
I am new in Python, I have Portable Python 2.7.5.1 installed on Windows 7.
I want to install additional libraries:
python-magic
libmagic
libfuzzy
pyqtgraph
I downloaded package, saved on hard drive, unzipped, find setup.py and
tried install via
I am new in Python, I have Portable Python 2.7.5.1 installed on Windows 7.
I want to install additional libraries:
python-magic
libmagic
libfuzzy
pyqtgraph
I downloaded package, saved on hard drive, unzipped, find setup.py and tried
install via Command Prompt:
Python-Portable.exe setup.py
properly.
Do such a scripts also exist for Portable python?
Portable Python is just Python with some helper scripts for not
requiring a system installation.
So "command-line-command-to-run-portable-python virtualenv " should be all you need.
Hmm I guess I didn't express myself very
ch
> > path for python and pythor elated tools (pip / easy_install) is setup
> > properly.
> > Do such a scripts also exist for Portable python?
>
>
> Portable Python is just Python with some helper scripts for not
> requiring a system installation.
>
> So &quo
a scripts also exist for Portable python?
Portable Python is just Python with some helper scripts for not
requiring a system installation.
So "command-line-command-to-run-portable-python virtualenv " should be all you need.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 08/12/2012 09:52 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 12/08/2012 01:49, Gelonida N wrote:
I think it would be great if the official portable python release
contained some upport for launching scripts.
Perhaps it exists alrady and I just didn't find it?
If not,then I wouldn't mind if my
e the Windows
Script Host instead of DOS command scripts to write the launchers.
I.e. use JScript or VBScript to do exactly the same thing. I don't know
much about Windows shortcut (*.lnk) files; if they can contain relative
paths, you could just create shortcuts that launch portable python with
On 12/08/2012 01:49, Gelonida N wrote:
I just started looking at portable Python and was rather surprised, that
I didn't find any recommended method in the documentation of how to
launch scripts with portable python.
Creating py2exe scripts on ones own USB drive seems to be kind of overkill
ripts to write the launchers.
I.e. use JScript or VBScript to do exactly the same thing. I don't know
much about Windows shortcut (*.lnk) files; if they can contain relative
paths, you could just create shortcuts that launch portable python with
the script.
Thomas
--
http://mail.python.o
I just started looking at portable Python and was rather surprised, that
I didn't find any recommended method in the documentation of how to
launch scripts with portable python.
Creating py2exe scripts on ones own USB drive seems to be kind of overkill.
So here my own thoughts / suggest
back to
it's state before calling activate.
Do such a scripts also exist for Portable python?
If anybody wrote already such scripts, then couldn't they be added to
the official portable python release?
I never used portable python so far but can't imagine, that I'm the
I bet that the difference is in the environment settings (PYTHONPATH).
Look here for details how to set it manually:
http://docs.python.org/using/windows.html
Hope it helps,
S.Nizamov
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 27, 7:01 pm, Alec Taylor wrote:
> You're looking for
> this:http://www.portablepython.com/wiki/PortablePython2.7.2.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:48 PM, yixuan wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I copy python 2.7.2 folder from other machine to my new installed
> > Windows XP.
> > If I run
You're looking for this:
http://www.portablepython.com/wiki/PortablePython2.7.2.1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:48 PM, yixuan wrote:
> Hello,
> I copy python 2.7.2 folder from other machine to my new installed
> Windows XP.
> If I run python.exe it would say side by side error, it is caused by
> crt
Hello,
I copy python 2.7.2 folder from other machine to my new installed
Windows XP.
If I run python.exe it would say side by side error, it is caused by
crt environment.
I copy msvc90 runtime and manifest into my folder, python.exe seems
working now.
But when I used 'import FixTk', it would say "d
me where I want while
I work on a new release of Portable Python in parallel :)
regards,
Perica
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/1/2011 3:59 PM, Perica Zivkovic wrote:
when those versions of Portable Python were published, they were the
latest available versions of Python.
2.6.1: December 2008; 3.0.1: February 2009
Unfortunately I did not had time
to update them since the last release.
If you have not done any
Hi Terry,
when those versions of Portable Python were published, they were the latest
available versions of Python. Unfortunately I did not had time to update them
since the last release.
regards,
Perica
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/1/2011 10:14 AM, Perica Zivkovic wrote:
All,
Portable Python challenge - round 1 has started !
Answer one simple question and you can win 4GB USB fingerprint
drive.
In exchange for name and email...
The question: "What is the exact date (day month and year) of the first
Por
All,
Portable Python challenge - round 1 has started !
Answer one simple question and you can win 4GB USB fingerprint drive.
http://www.egistec.com/en/sensors/fingerprintUSB.aspx
This round of Portable Python challenge is sponsored by EgisTec Inc. In the
future challenges we will test your
Is it possible / easy to use PyQt with portable python?
I've done some googling and found one message that said
this is coming in the next version, but I can't find anything
on portablepython.com that mentions it.
Has anyone done this before? Have any better information
on how to set
Is there any difference in functionality between standard Python pack
and portable Python?
It is not so easy to install third party modules for portable Python...
Why standard Python pack installation requires reboot after installation?
It is not true for all operating systems. At least
Is there any difference in functionality between standard Python pack and
portable Python? Why standard Python pack installation requires reboot after
installation?
Can portable Python used from hard drive folder?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ickle',
> managingEditor='',
> )
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Joe Larson wrote:
>
>> Hello list!
>>
>> I am a Python Beginner. I thought a good beginning project would be to use
>> the
'jobs.rss',
'jobs.pickle',
managingEditor='',
)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Joe Larson wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I am a Python Beginner. I thought a good beginning project would be to use
> th
Hello list!
I am a Python Beginner. I thought a good beginning project would be to
use the Portable Python environment http://www.portablepython.com/ with
Beautiful Soup http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/ and Scrape
'N' Feed http://www.crummy.com/software/ScrapeNFeed/ to
This is a great piece of work. Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dear people,
Portable Python 1.1 is released in three flavors: Python 2.5.4, 2.6.1
and 3.0.1. More information:
Included in this release:
-
This release contains three different packages for three different
Python versions – Python 2.5.4, Python 2.6.1 and Python 3.0.1
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, asit
wrote:
> from socket import *
I think I'd make it a policy not to help with any scripts that contain
wildcard imports.
> status={0:"open",10049:"address not available",10061:"closed",
> 10060:"timeout",10056:"already connected",10035:"filtered",11001:"IP
> no
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this the o/p
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hack$ python portscan.py 59.93.128.10 10 20
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "portscan.py", line 33, in
>print str(port) + " : " + scan(ip,port,timeout)
> File "portscan.py", line
Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:33:33 -0700 schrieb asit:
> On Oct 24, 11:18 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
>> > should be same in both cases. But why the f
On Oct 24, 11:18 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
> > should be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in
> > windows but error one
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
> should be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in
> windows but error one in Linux ???
What error message do you get in linux? How are you r
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:42:21 -0700, asit wrote:
> I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p should
> be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in windows
> but error one in Linux ???
So what *is* the error on Linux!?
> def scan(ip,port,timeout):
>
I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
should be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in
windows but error one in Linux ???
from socket import *
import sys
status={0:"open",10049:"address not available",10061:"closed",
10060:"timeout",10056:"alread
It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:09:20 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
> It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:38:58 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
>> ifconfig information into Python.
>
> After lots of trial and error (I'm prof
It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:38:58 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
> ifconfig information into Python.
After lots of trial and error (I'm proficient in C at all), I puzzled
togehter the following. It works (at least
It was 3 Mar 2007 18:43:57 -0800, when MonkeeSage wrote:
> Bart,
>
> Can you try this and let us know if it works for FreeBSD?
thanks for you suggestions!
> import socket, fcntl, struct
>
> def _ifinfo(sock, addr, ifname):
> iface = struct.pack('256s', ifname[:15])
> info = fcntl.ioctl(s
Bart,
Can you try this and let us know if it works for FreeBSD?
import socket, fcntl, struct
def _ifinfo(sock, addr, ifname):
iface = struct.pack('256s', ifname[:15])
info = fcntl.ioctl(sock.fileno(), addr, iface)
if addr == 0x8927:
hwaddr = []
for char in info[18:24
On Mar 3, 7:17 pm, "MonkeeSage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the offsets would be different for BSD
Then again, mabye not.
http://freebsd.active-venture.com/FreeBSD-srctree/newsrc/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.h.html
Regards,
Jordan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On Mar 3, 3:38 pm, Bart Van Loon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
> ifconfig information into Python.
Here's a pure python version of the C extension, based on the recipes
you posted. In this version, the 'addr' key will not exist f
Hi all,
I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
ifconfig information into Python.
Some research on the web brought me to Linux only solutions
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/439094
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/43909
Stef,
I never used Python4Delphi but I added it to the
list-of-things-to-examine :)
FOR ALL: I created google group for Portable Python
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/portablepython and posted few items
for discussion there :) Please if you have ideas/suggestions post it
there!
grtz
> and something like Enthought edition will be there :) with even more
> packages and options :) at least that is my goal for the future :) But
> I must say I will also always be carefull with size of the distro :)
> thats also important right? :)
Coming from MatLab, that's not the most important t
yes on both last messages :)
More platforms will be included if there is enoug people interested in
that.
and something like Enthought edition will be there :) with even more
packages and options :) at least that is my goal for the future :) But
I must say I will also always be carefull with size
perica> but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
Including maybe other platforms than Windows?
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right now there is not a big difference with Movable Python.
> - Smaller size but less libraries in default package
> - Portable Python comes with django
> - Uses SciTE not SPE
>
> but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
>
any plans for
Right now there is not a big difference with Movable Python.
- Smaller size but less libraries in default package
- Portable Python comes with django
- Uses SciTE not SPE
but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
grtz
Perica
Steve Holden wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to announce the *first* beta release of the Portable
> Python 1.0 beta. From today Portable Python website is also online and
> you can find it on the location www.PortablePython.com.
>
> About:
> Portable Python
Hi there,
I would like to announce the *first* beta release of the Portable
Python 1.0 beta. From today Portable Python website is also online and
you can find it on the location www.PortablePython.com.
About:
Portable Python is a Python programming language preconfigured to run
directly from a
66 matches
Mail list logo
