Isaac Gouy wrote:
[...]
> I think it would be silly to dispute whether or not programs that have
> import psyco; psyco.bind are Python programs.
>
> I'm not sure it would be equally silly to dispute whether or not
> programs with type declarations have moved away from being Python
> programs.
i do
On Mar 2, 12:02 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> >>> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> As long as that gives you improvements of
> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with cha
Paul Boddie wrote:
On 1 Mar, 15:20, Steve Holden wrote:
Kless wrote:
Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has
On 1 Mar, 15:20, Steve Holden wrote:
> Kless wrote:
> > Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> > Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> > 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you think th
2009/3/1 Paul Rubin :
> Steve Holden writes:
>> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
Yes, and they care about the cost of programs, and about the
functionality of programs. If I wanted fast co
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Isaac Gouy wrote:
>>> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
As long as that gives you improvements of
100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
the platform just because someone shows me
On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> As long as that gives you improvements of
> >> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
> >> the platform just because someone shows me benchmark results of
On Mar 1, 11:15 am, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Isaac Gouy (Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST))
>
> > On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > > Paul Rubin wrote:
> > > > Steve Holden writes:
> > > >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> > > > In the real w
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> As long as that gives you improvements of
>> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
>> the platform just because someone shows me benchmark results of some code
>> that I absolutely don't need in my dai
* Isaac Gouy (Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST))
> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Paul Rubin wrote:
> > > Steve Holden writes:
> > >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
> >
> > > In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
> > Steve Holden writes:
> >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> > In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
>
> Fine, but theShootoutonAliothisn't a particularly pythonic
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steve Holden writes:
>> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
Fine, but the Shootout on Alioth isn't a particularly pythonic one. It
deals almost exclusively with computati
Steve Holden writes:
> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kless wrote:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
>
I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
Unless, of course, yo
Kless schrieb:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
Python 3.0 is slower than Python 2.5 and 2.6. Lot's of code was added or
modified -- co
Is this what you are looking for?
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=python3&lang2=yarv&box=1
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Kless wrote:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language to
Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
17 matches
Mail list logo
