"Gregory Piñero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ahh, so it's a mutable thing. That makes sense that I can't change a
>mutable object and thus can't affect it outside of the function.
You of course meant immutable, but this is still confused. It is a
name-binding
"Christopher Subich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> In a more simplistic view, I'd reverse the phrasing... The name
>> "x" is assigned to the object "y" (implying it is no longer attached to
>> whatever used to have the name)
I agree tha
