Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > So, if fifteen different programs depend on library X, we'd have
> > fifteen *separate* installations of library X on the same machine?
> >
> You need to get your opinions up to date. Fifteen copies of a single
> library is nothing i
> Agreed, but until we reach the ideal situation where everybody is using
> the same package dependency system what's your practical solution?
> "Self-contained" has the merit that nobody else's changes are going to
> bugger about with my application on a customer's system. The extra disk
> space i
Ben Finney wrote:
> "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In my opinion, python is steering here to a direction like Java with
>> it's classpath: scripts like workingenv and it's successor (forgot
>> the name) provide hand-tailored environments for a specific
>> application.
>
> Wha
"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my opinion, python is steering here to a direction like Java with
> it's classpath: scripts like workingenv and it's successor (forgot
> the name) provide hand-tailored environments for a specific
> application.
What a silly waste of resources.