On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:55:57 -0400, Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> Will/should an __init__.py in the current directory be required,
>> to control what happens (and lessen the probability of accidental
>> collision from a random working directory)?
>
>I don't think
Bengt Richter wrote:
> Will/should an __init__.py in the current directory be required,
> to control what happens (and lessen the probability of accidental
> collision from a random working directory)?
I don't think so. That would simply shift the possibility of mysterious
behaviour from the iss
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:25:26 -0400, Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ben Finney wrote:
>> Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, under PEP 328 rules, the original poster's current-directory
module could only be imported (a) if the current dire
Ben Finney wrote:
> Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>So, under PEP 328 rules, the original poster's current-directory
>>>module could only be imported (a) if the current directory was in
>>>sys.path, or (b) if the code specified a relative import. The
>>>a
Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, under PEP 328 rules, the original poster's current-directory
> >module could only be imported (a) if the current directory was in
> >sys.path, or (b) if the code specified a relative import. The
> >accidental shadowing
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So, under PEP 328 rules, the original poster's current-directory
>module could only be imported (a) if the current directory was in
>sys.path, or (b) if the code specified a relative import. The
>accidental shadowing of the s
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once PEP 328 is fully implemented, all bare 'import foo' statements
> specify absolute imports (i.e. from sys.path only). To perform a
> relative import (e.g. from current directory) will require different
> syntax.
It seems like this will break lots of exis
Ben Finney wrote:
> Once PEP 328 is fully implemented, all bare 'import foo' statements
> specify absolute imports (i.e. from sys.path only). To perform a
> relative import (e.g. from current directory) will require different
> syntax.
I'm not completely familiar with either, but how will that inf
Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>[current-directory module shadowing a system module]
> >
> > All hail the coming of PEP 328:
> > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0328.html>
>
> Which, unless I misunderstand, would do nothi
