Westley Martínez :
> Thankfully you don't often need to use this in C++ like you do with
> self in Python.
Self pity is not attractive.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/03/2014 01:56, Westley Martínez wrote:
Why did C++ use this? I don't really like this. It doesn't sound right. I think
it's because I have trouble saying the th sound without getting my mouth full
of spit.
Thankfully you don't often need to use this in C++ like you do with self in
Pytho
Why did C++ use this? I don't really like this. It doesn't sound right. I think
it's because I have trouble saying the th sound without getting my mouth full
of spit.
Thankfully you don't often need to use this in C++ like you do with self in
Python.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On 2014-03-05 03:45, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:17:09 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-03-04 02:09, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800 (PST), Westley Martínez declaimed:
>> I understand that in an object method the first argument in the
>> object
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:17:09 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
> On 2014-03-04 02:09, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800 (PST), Westley Martínez declaimed:
> >> I understand that in an object method the first argument in the
> >> object itself, called self. However, it does
On 2014-03-04 14:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:47:09 +, MRAB wrote:
In AppleScript a script can refer to the title of a window as
"title of window" or "window's title", and it can refer to the
title of its own window as "title of window of me" or "me's
window's title". C
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:47:09 +, MRAB wrote:
> In AppleScript a script can refer to the title of a window as "title of
> window" or "window's title", and it can refer to the title of its own
> window as "title of window of me" or "me's window's title". Consistent,
> yes, but bad English.
>
> T
On 2014-03-04 02:09, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800 (PST), Westley Martínez
declaimed the following:
I understand that in an object method the first argument in the
object itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called
self, and can be called anything.
In article ,
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800 (PST), Westley Martínez
> declaimed the following:
>
> >I understand that in an object method the first argument in the object
> >itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called self, and can be
> >called a
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800 (PST), Westley Martínez
> declaimed the following:
>
>>I understand that in an object method the first argument in the object
>>itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called self, and can b
On 3/3/2014 1:16 AM, Westley Martínez wrote:
I understand that in an object method the first argument in the
object itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called
self, and can be called anything. So my question is why is it called
self and not this like from C++ and Java. It's kin
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Westley Martínez wrote:
> I understand that in an object method the first argument in the object
> itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called self, and can be
> called anything. So my question is why is it called self and not this like
> from C
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:16:31 -0800, Westley Martínez wrote:
> I understand that in an object method the first argument in the object
> itself, called self. However, it doesn't have to be called self, and
> can be called anything. So my question is why is it called self and not
> this like from C
I understand that in an object method the first argument in the object itself,
called self. However, it doesn't have to be called self, and can be called
anything. So my question is why is it called self and not this like from C++
and Java. It's kind of a silly question, but one that I'm curi
14 matches
Mail list logo
