"Christoph Rackwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You didn't quite get the OP's intention, I guess.
>
> The OP wanted Python to be a bit more freeform by adding "end" tags.
> That might be an improvement for web scripting, but I haven't seen the
> solutions of the existing frameworks and won't dar
You didn't quite get the OP's intention, I guess.
The OP wanted Python to be a bit more freeform by adding "end" tags.
That might be an improvement for web scripting, but I haven't seen the
solutions of the existing frameworks and won't dare to compare.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
Sokolov Yura wrote:
> I think, allowing to specify blocks with algol style (for-end, if-end,
> etc) will allow to write easy php-like templates
> and would attract new web developers to python (as php and ruby do).
> It can be straight compilled into Python bytecode cause there is
> one-to-one tr
I think, allowing to specify blocks with algol style (for-end, if-end,
etc) will allow to write easy php-like templates
and would attract new web developers to python (as php and ruby do).
It can be straight compilled into Python bytecode cause there is
one-to-one transformation.
So this:
# -*- s
