Lothar Werzinger tradescape.biz> writes:
> Wow, that really MAKES a difference! Thanks a lot!
You should also try Python 2.7 or 3.1. We've recently optimized the garabage
collector for situations where many objects are being created.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Otten wrote:
> Lothar Werzinger wrote:
>> Can anyone explain this oddity? Any insight is highly appreciated.
>
> When you are creating objects like there is no tomorrow Python's cyclic
> garbage collections often takes a significant amount of time. The first
> thing I'd try is therefore swi
Lothar Werzinger wrote:
> I am trying to load files into a dictionary for analysis. the size of the
> dictionary will grow quite large (several million entries) and as
> inserting into a dictionary is roughly O(n) I figured if I loaded each
> file into it's own dictionary it would speed things up.
Lothar Werzinger wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to load files into a dictionary for analysis. the size of the
dictionary will grow quite large (several million entries) and as inserting
into a dictionary is roughly O(n) I figured if I loaded each file into it's
own dictionary it would speed things up
Hi,
I am trying to load files into a dictionary for analysis. the size of the
dictionary will grow quite large (several million entries) and as inserting
into a dictionary is roughly O(n) I figured if I loaded each file into it's
own dictionary it would speed things up. However it did not.
So
