Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>
> > Anyway, try googling "evil mangler"
>
> I know what the "evil mangler" is. It was called that because it
> threw away all the principles of good software design in favour
> of expediency. GHC now has a new LLVM backend which does not
> depend o
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:29:54PM EST, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 3/1/2011 3:59 PM Chris Jones said...
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:03:02PM EST, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 3/1/2011 12:43 AM Erik de Castro Lopo said...
>>
Why Python?
>>>
>>> For me? Because it's executable pseudoco
On 3/1/2011 3:59 PM Chris Jones said...
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:03:02PM EST, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 3/1/2011 12:43 AM Erik de Castro Lopo said...
Why Python?
For me? Because it's executable pseudocode
Not for nothing, Emile.. hey.. you could end up with pseudo bugs and
pseudo hea
On Mar 2, 3:30 am, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2/28/11 10:03 AM, Fred Marshall wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an engineering
> > app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the objectives
> > would to
> > be make reasonable use of the available
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Definitely not. As I said I used Python for a number of years
> and ditched it in favour of Ocaml and Haskell.
>
These are all 3 intriguing languages. I wish I had time to learn OCaML and
Haskell, and I wish one or both of them were nea
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:03:02PM EST, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 3/1/2011 12:43 AM Erik de Castro Lopo said...
>> Why Python?
>
> For me? Because it's executable pseudocode
Not for nothing, Emile.. hey.. you could end up with pseudo bugs and
pseudo headaches ..
cj
--
http://mail.python.or
Am Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:03:01 -0800 schrieb Fred Marshall:
> I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
> engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
> objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
> (objects, etc.). So, I'
geremy condra wrote:
> Ah, so you're looking for an argument. This is abuse, you want room
> 12A just down the hall.
They have comfy chairs there. No one expects it.
--
Tom Zych / freethin...@pobox.com
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>
>> Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
>> > Why Python? I really can't understand the rush of every man and
>> > his dog to Python.
>>
>> Are you trolling?
>
> All my responses to this thread are really mean for comp.dsp,
>
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> > Why Python? I really can't understand the rush of every man and
> > his dog to Python.
>
> Are you trolling?
All my responses to this thread are really mean for comp.dsp,
not for comp.lang.python.
Erik
--
On 3/1/2011 12:43 AM Erik de Castro Lopo said...
Why Python?
For me? Because it's executable pseudocode
Emile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> > Why Python? I really can't understand the rush of every man and
> > his dog to Python.
>
> Are you trolling?
Definitely not. As I said I used Python for a number of years
and ditched it in favour of Ocaml and Haskell.
The ease of development
On 2/28/11 10:03 AM, Fred Marshall wrote:
I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an engineering
app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the objectives would to
be make reasonable use of the available structure (objects, etc.). So, I'd like
to read a couple o
On 01/03/2011 09:24, Richard Dobson wrote:
But - I am ~still~ caught out by the
semantic significance of indenting. Looks OK enough on paper, but doing
it interactively is another matter.
I still don't fully understand this argument. With Python, I am still
doing indentation almost exactly the
On Mar 1, 3:03 am, Fred Marshall
wrote:
> I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
> engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
> objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
> (objects, etc.). So, I'd like to read a c
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Why Python? I really can't understand the rush of every man and
> his dog to Python.
> Its not that I'm a stick in the mud stuck with C and C++, rather
> that I used Python for a number of years from 1998 to 2004 and
> rejected it in favour of strict statically typed fu
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> Why Python? I really can't understand the rush of every man and
> his dog to Python.
Are you trolling? Anyway, try googling "evil mangler" and ask why it
wasn't done in Haskell. Same idea.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 01/03/2011 08:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Fred Marshall wrote:
I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
(objects, etc.).
Fred Marshall wrote:
> I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
> engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
> objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
> (objects, etc.). So, I'd like to read a couple of good, s
On 2/28/2011 8:14 AM, n00m wrote:
On Feb 28, 6:03 pm, Fred Marshall
wrote:
The best place for you to start: http://numpy.scipy.org/
Numpy manual: http://www.tramy.us/numpybook.pdf
OK Thanks!
Fred
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 28, 6:03 pm, Fred Marshall
wrote:
> I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
> engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
> objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
> (objects, etc.). So, I'd like to read a
I'm interested in developing Python-based programs, including an
engineering app. ... re-writing from Fortran and C versions. One of the
objectives would to be make reasonable use of the available structure
(objects, etc.). So, I'd like to read a couple of good, simple
scientific-oriented pro
22 matches
Mail list logo