Am 09.05.2021 um 02:34 schrieb Michael Torrie:
> On 5/8/21 3:28 PM, Mirko via Python-list wrote:
>>
>> I apologize for this OT post, especially because it's in reply to an
>> at least partly troll post, but I just can't resist. Sorry.
>>
>> P.S.: *NOT* among the core symptoms of (the high-function
On 5/9/21 11:26 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how do people without a Code of Conduct
> manage and prevent abuse in between people? I was about
> to organise something last year but did not find a better solution
> than a code of conduct to ensure smoothness. Well the idea
Greetings,
Out of curiosity, how do people without a Code of Conduct
manage and prevent abuse in between people? I was about
to organise something last year but did not find a better solution
than a code of conduct to ensure smoothness. Well the idea was a
before-hand signed code of conduct. It be
> I disagree. Many people are opposed to CoCs for a variety of reasons
> including the fact that many CoCs are political in nature. Others
> oppose them for legal liability reasons. On his radio show Ask Noah (a
> radio show about Linux), Noah has interviewed several people who oppose
> CoCs for
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 1:58 PM dn via Python-list
wrote:
> That said, there is nothing to be gained by upsetting people...
>
I misquoted the relevant section from Chris' answer, i wanted to quote:
*I'm not saying that the previous situation was GOOD, but I'm far fromsure
that the current si
On 09/05/2021 20.31, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 5:29 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>
>> Probably the same reason it has never worked. The only thing that's
>> changed is the social acceptability of vilifying those you don't like.
>> Once upon a time, there were those i
I meant to quote this part actually:
I'm not saying that the previous situation was GOOD, but I'm far from
sure that the current situation is any better - look at the arguments
regarding branch naming, which completely sidelined all technical
considerations in favour of one single political motiva
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 5:29 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Probably the same reason it has never worked. The only thing that's
> changed is the social acceptability of vilifying those you don't like.
> Once upon a time, there were those in the community who had all the
> power, and those on the fri
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 11:10 AM Michael Torrie wrote:
>
> On 5/8/21 6:23 PM, Jason C. McDonald wrote:
> > Usually, I find when people dump on CoCs, they're just angry at
> > accountability. I haven't known anyone yet who was a productive
> > member of Python and opposed to the CoC, at least in pri
On 5/8/21 6:23 PM, Jason C. McDonald wrote:
> Usually, I find when people dump on CoCs, they're just angry at
> accountability. I haven't known anyone yet who was a productive
> member of Python and opposed to the CoC, at least in principle
> and aim.
I disagree. Many people are opposed to CoCs f
On 5/8/21 3:28 PM, Mirko via Python-list wrote:
>
> I apologize for this OT post, especially because it's in reply to an
> at least partly troll post, but I just can't resist. Sorry.
>
> P.S.: *NOT* among the core symptoms of (the high-functioning levels)
> of ASS is the inability to learn. Mind
Very well said! It's quite easy to use one's disadvantages as an excuse
for anti-social behavior. The Code of Conduct certainly isn't perfect,
but it has proven to be one of the most effective tools in keeping a
community healthy.
Usually, I find when people dump on CoCs, they're just angry at
acc
I apologize for this OT post, especially because it's in reply to an
at least partly troll post, but I just can't resist. Sorry.
Am 08.05.2021 um 14:09 schrieb Talkie Toaster:
> On 06/05/2021 18:56, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> Quite frankly I don't care how this discussion goes as the Python
>> co
13 matches
Mail list logo
