[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm all for using for the latest version of Python. I'm just now
> learning about Python classes, and it seems like there were some
> significant changes at 2.2.
I don't remember exactly what appeared when, but nothing you
learn with 2.1 will stop working in 2.2 (I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If I were you, I'd check with ESRI support if you can't
>> use a newer version of Python. I think it's possible.
>
> I think it is as well and am looking into it.
It's possible if they choose to build the necessary binary modules
(DLLs).
On Windows, Python extension m
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Are you using an old version of ESRI software, or are
> they shipping a product with an ancient version of Python?
We're using the latest and greatest ArcGIS Desktop product, which is at
release 9.1. Evidently they chose to use Python 2.1 to ensure a "silent
install" when Arc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Been using the ODBC module for Python 2.1
>
>
> It might well become a problem that you are stuck with
> a five year old Python version. Python 2.1 is no longer
> a supported Python version. Suppor
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Magnus Lycka wrote:
>
>> Concerning mxODBC, you might want to have a second look
>>at it. ... a licence might well be worth its price.
>
> Yup, it _is_ a great deal. I worked with mxODBC in a former
> job at DevelopNET, and (A) the license cost was _low_, and (B
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Concerning mxODBC, you might want to have a second look
> at it. ... a licence might well be worth its price.
Yup, it _is_ a great deal. I worked with mxODBC in a former
job at DevelopNET, and (A) the license cost was _low_, and (B)
it saved me enough time in the first
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Been using the ODBC module for Python 2.1
It might well become a problem that you are stuck with
a five year old Python version. Python 2.1 is no longer
a supported Python version. Support for 2.2 will probably
end soon.
Are you using an old version of ESRI software, o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Incidentally, I have just ordered:
>
> * Learning Python
> * Python Cookbook
> * Python Pocket Reference
>
> Are there any other books y'all would recommend as essential Python
> references and/or books for becoming fluent in Python?
Both Beazley's "Python Essential Re
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the double-thanks Frank.
> >
> > I'm using Python 2.1 for Win32 and import datetime fails.
> >
> > Does the datetime module come standard with later releases of Python?
> > If so, which release? If not, will datetime with with Pyth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for the double-thanks Frank.
>
> I'm using Python 2.1 for Win32 and import datetime fails.
>
> Does the datetime module come standard with later releases of Python?
> If so, which release? If not, will datetime with with Python 2.1, if it
> will, where can I get
Sorry for the double-thanks Frank.
I'm using Python 2.1 for Win32 and import datetime fails.
Does the datetime module come standard with later releases of Python?
If so, which release? If not, will datetime with with Python 2.1, if it
will, where can I get it? I'm still such a newbie with Python
Thanks Frank. Much appreciated. I will give it a go.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks Frank. Much appreciated. I will give it a go.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Been using the ODBC module for Python 2.1 (Win32) and had another
> question. When I return data from date columns, it's in a strange
> object form, e.g. (don't have the output in front
> of me>.
>
> What's an easy way to convert date objects into a human-readable
> str
Been using the ODBC module for Python 2.1 (Win32) and had another
question. When I return data from date columns, it's in a strange
object form, e.g. (don't have the output in front
of me>.
What's an easy way to convert date objects into a human-readable
string? I'm using this module to extract d
15 matches
Mail list logo
