On Mar 26, 5:03 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 5:02 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I am trying to use lamdba to generate some functions, and it is not
> >> working
> >> the way I'd expect. The code is below, followed by the r
On Mar 26, 6:03 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 5:02 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I am trying to use lamdba to generate some functions, and it is not
> >> working
> >> the way I'd expect. The code is below, followed by the r
George Sakkis wrote:
> On Mar 26, 5:02 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to use lamdba to generate some functions, and it is not
>> working
>> the way I'd expect. The code is below, followed by the results I'm
>> getting. More comments below that.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> S
On Mar 26, 5:02 pm, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use lamdba to generate some functions, and it is not working
> the way I'd expect. The code is below, followed by the results I'm
> getting. More comments below that.
>
> (...)
>
> So, is there some scoping issue with
I am trying to use lamdba to generate some functions, and it is not working
the way I'd expect. The code is below, followed by the results I'm
getting. More comments below that.
patterns = (
('[sxz]$', '$','es'),
('[^aeioudgkprt]h$', '$', 'es'),
('[^aeiou]y$', 'y$', 'ies'),
('$',
