Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (btw, I've always thought that Python was all about making it easy to
> express the solution to a given problem in code, not to let you write
> programs without using your brain. when did that change?)
The day Google App Engine was opened up to developer
Aahz wrote:
why are you using a queue for this case, btw? why not just use a plain list
L = []
lock = threading.Lock()
and add stuff using append in the monitor threads
with lock:
L.append(item)
Because using a queue requires less thinking.
given that the whole reason
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Martin DeMello wrote:
>>
>> In the interests of not hammering the db unnecessarily, I'm
>> considering the following
>> 1. A series of independent "monitor" threads that collect information
>> over TCP from the cluster of ma
On Sep 4, 1:51 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin DeMello wrote:
> > I'm writing a cluster monitor, that collects information from a set of
> > machines and logs it to a database
>
> > In the interests of not hammering the db unnecessarily, I'm
> > considering the following
> > 1
Martin DeMello wrote:
I'm writing a cluster monitor, that collects information from a set of
machines and logs it to a database
In the interests of not hammering the db unnecessarily, I'm
considering the following
1. A series of independent "monitor" threads that collect information
over TCP fr
On Sep 4, 1:04 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Random access isn't supported by the defined interface. You can make
> it more convenient, though.
Thanks. I wasn't looking for random access, just wondering what the
cleanest way to implement items = Queue.get_all() was. Your code
shou
On Sep 4, 2:51 pm, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 12:41 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "task_done" just decrements a counter (incremented by "put"). when the
> > counter reaches zero, the "join" call is unblocked.
>
> Thanks! Is there any standard python
On Sep 4, 12:41 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "task_done" just decrements a counter (incremented by "put"). when the
> counter reaches zero, the "join" call is unblocked.
Thanks! Is there any standard python idiom to empty a queue into a
list? Or do I just call get() repeatedly
Martin DeMello wrote:
Reading up on python's built in Queue class, though, it seems oriented
towards "job queues", with a two-step dequeue operation (get() and
task_done()). I'm worried that this would make it too heavyweight for
my application. Is ther documentation somewhere on what exactly
ta
I'm writing a cluster monitor, that collects information from a set of
machines and logs it to a database
In the interests of not hammering the db unnecessarily, I'm
considering the following
1. A series of independent "monitor" threads that collect information
over TCP from the cluster of machine
10 matches
Mail list logo
