On 18/02/11 07:29, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 18Feb2011 08:40, I wrote:
> | On 17Feb2011 18:40, Alister Ware wrote:
> | | On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:42:05 +0800, Werner wrote:
> | | > On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
> | | >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
> | | >>> I have a t
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 02/17/2011 04:10 PM, Werner wrote:
> Just for your information, your code is the equivalent of:
>
> while True:
> temp = range(2000)
>
> The for loop does absolutely nothing in your case. After the range is
> computed, the for loo
On 02/17/2011 09:15 PM, Larry Hudson wrote:
> A true time waster indeed -- it's an infinite loop that will _never_ end.
>
> Others have already about the need of the shebang line to run as a python
> script, but I'm
> surprised no one mentioned how truly useless this code is.
>
> The i = 0 line
On 02/17/2011 04:10 PM, Werner wrote:
> It is meant to put load on a CPU, RAM and disk (swap). The code now
> looks like this:
> #!/usr/bin/python
> while True:
> i = 0
> for i in range(2000):
> break
Just for your information, your code is the equivalent of:
while True:
t
On 02/17/2011 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
while True:
i = 0
for i in range(10):
break
_
It runs fine with Eric bu
On 18Feb2011 08:40, I wrote:
| On 17Feb2011 18:40, Alister Ware wrote:
| | On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:42:05 +0800, Werner wrote:
| | > On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
| | >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
| | >>> I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
|
On 18/02/11 02:40, Alister Ware wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:42:05 +0800, Werner wrote:
>
>> On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
__
On 17Feb2011 18:40, Alister Ware wrote:
| On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:42:05 +0800, Werner wrote:
|
| > On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
| >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
| >>> I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
| >>>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:42:05 +0800, Werner wrote:
> On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
>>> I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
>>>
>>>
>>> while True:
>>>i = 0
On 17/02/11 16:39, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
>> I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
>>
>>
>> while True:
>>i = 0
>>for i in range(10):
>>break
>> _
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Werner wrote:
> I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
>
>
> while True:
> i = 0
> for i in range(10):
> break
> _
>
> It r
can you share the first line of your shell (shabang) ?
I think you have forgotten to tell the shell which interpreter to use
if you have not put #!/usr/bin/python then its plain shell script which is
incorrect
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Werner wrote:
> I have a trivially simple piece o
I have a trivially simple piece of code called timewaster.py:
while True:
i = 0
for i in range(10):
break
_
It runs fine with Eric but when I try to run it from shell...
> ./ti
13 matches
Mail list logo
