Roel Schroeven schreef:
> import time
>
> input_files = ["./test_file0.txt", "./test_file1.txt"]
>
> total_start = time.time()
> data = {}
> for input_fn in input_files:
> file_start = time.time()
> f = file(input_fn, 'r')
> data[input_fn] = f.read()
> f.close()
> file_do
Jeroen Hegeman schreef:
> Thanks for the comments,
>
>> (First, I had to add timing code to ReadClasses: the code you posted
>> doesn't include them, and only shows timings for ReadLines.)
>>
>> Your program uses quite a bit of memory. I guess it gets harder and
>> harder to allocate the required
On Sep 25, 1:51 am, Jeroen Hegeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
> > above line of output -- IOW, you have not posted the code that you
> > actually ran.
>
> Oh my, I must have cleaned it up a bit too much, hoping that people
>
Two comments,
> ...
> self.item3 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item4 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item5 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> self.item6 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
> ...
this here (and your code in general) is mind boggling and not in a
good way,
as for you original question, I don't think that read
>
> Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
> above line of output -- IOW, you have not posted the code that you
> actually ran.
Oh my, I must have cleaned it up a bit too much, hoping that people
would focus on the issue instead of the formatting of the output
Thanks for the comments,
>
> (First, I had to add timing code to ReadClasses: the code you posted
> doesn't include them, and only shows timings for ReadLines.)
>
> Your program uses quite a bit of memory. I guess it gets harder and
> harder to allocate the required amounts of memory.
Well, I gue
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gabriel
Genellina wrote:
> En Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:34:40 -0300, Jeroen Hegeman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�:
>
>> class ModerateClass:
>> def __init__(self):
>> return
>> def __del__(self):
>> pass
>> return
>>
>> class HugeCla
Jeroen Hegeman schreef:
> ...processing all 2 files found
> --> 1/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 0.093 s
> ...took 8.85717201233 seconds
> --> 2/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 3.917 s
> ...took 12.8725550175 seconds
>
> So the first t
En Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:34:40 -0300, Jeroen Hegeman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�:
> So the first time around the file gets read in in ~0.1 seconds, the
> second time around it needs almost four seconds! As far as I can see
> this is related to 'something in memory being copied around' since if
>
On Sep 22, 2:34 am, Jeroen Hegeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> ...processing all 2 files found
> --> 1/2: ./test_file0.txt
> Now reading ...
> DEBUG readLines A took 0.093 s
> ...took 8.85717201233 seconds
Your code does NOT include any statements that could have produced the
above line of
Dear Pythoneers,
I'm moderately new to python and it got me completely lost already.
I've got a bunch of large (30MB) txt files containing one 'event' per
line. I open files after each other, read them line by line and from
each line build a 'data structure' of a main class (HugeClass)
cont
11 matches
Mail list logo
