Hello Bengt,
Bengt Richter wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2005 03:38:37 -0800, "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Fuzzyman wrote:
> >> Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
> >> ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
> >> blog entry fo
On 1 Dec 2005 03:38:37 -0800, "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Fuzzyman wrote:
>> Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
>> ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
>> blog entry for link to archive of discussion).
>>
>> See the
Fuzzyman wrote:
> Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
> ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
> blog entry for link to archive of discussion).
>
> See the latest blog entry to get at it :
> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog
Fuzzyman wrote:
>>- One problem with the FancyDict is that it allows
>> d.keys.append(100)
>
>
> Are you sure ?
Not at all. This was from inspection only; I propably
misinterpreted the code.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
> > ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
> > blog entry for link to archive of discussion).
>
> Thanks. I'll try to check it out and put my oar i
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > Criticism solicited (honestly) :-)
>
> A couple of minor points:
> - I would drop 2.2 compatibility
There are a lot of cheap hosting accounts where Python 2.2 is all that
is available. I would only drop support if there is some *compelling*
reason to d
Fuzzyman wrote:
> Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
> ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
> blog entry for link to archive of discussion).
Thanks. I'll try to check it out and put my oar in over the next
weekend. One thing I a
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> A couple of minor points:
> - I would drop 2.2 compatibility
Unfortunately, there are a *lot* of systems out there where only 2.2 is support
(Red Hat 3.0 anyone?).
I know we'd like to be able to not support earlier versions (yes, I saw today's
messages on the djgpp p
Fuzzyman wrote:
> Criticism solicited (honestly) :-)
A couple of minor points:
- I would drop 2.2 compatibility
- self=self isn't needed in the functions, because of
nested scopes
- popitem(self) can be rewritten as
def popitem(self):
try:
key = self._sequence.pop()
Sorry for this hurried message - I've done a new implementation of out
ordered dict. This comes out of the discussion on this newsgroup (see
blog entry for link to archive of discussion).
See the latest blog entry to get at it :
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog/index.shtml
Criticism soli
10 matches
Mail list logo
