[Bengt Richter]
> I'm not sure, but I think it may be expedient optimization practicality
beating purity.
It is more a matter of coping with the limitations of the legacy API where want
to wrap a sequence iterator around __getitem__ in sequences but not in
mappings.
>
> I haven't walked the r
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:18:20 -0600, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
>> Someone pasted the original version of the following code snippet on
>> #python today. I started investigating why the new-style class didn't
>> work as expected, and found that at least som
[Tuure Laurinolli]
> Someone pasted the original version of the following code snippet on
> #python today. I started investigating why the new-style class didn't
> work as expected
> classes apparently don't return true for PyInstance_Check, which causes
> a problem in PySequence_Check, since it wi
Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
Someone pasted the original version of the following code snippet on
#python today. I started investigating why the new-style class didn't
work as expected, and found that at least some instances of new-style
classes apparently don't return true for PyInstance_Check, whic
Someone pasted the original version of the following code snippet on
#python today. I started investigating why the new-style class didn't
work as expected, and found that at least some instances of new-style
classes apparently don't return true for PyInstance_Check, which causes
a problem in P
