Paul Scott wrote:
... example:
if os.path.exists(os.path.join(basedir,picdir)) == True :
blah blah
Question is, is there a better way of doing this? The above *works* but
it looks kinda hackish...
You've had the joining addressed elsewhere, but note that:
if os.path.exists(os.path.join
On 2008-05-05, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today, I needed to concatenate a bunch of directory paths and files
> together based on user input to create file paths. I achieved this
> through nested os.path.join()'s which I am unsure if this is a good
> thing or n
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:34 -0400, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> How about not nesting the calls?
>
> >>> from os.path import join
> >>> join(join('x', 'y'), 'z') == join('x', 'y', 'z')
> True
> >>>
>
Great! Thanks. Didn't realise that you could do that... :)
--Paul
All Email o
On Mon, 05 May 2008 16:28:33 +0200, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:21 +0200, Paul Scott wrote:
example:
if os.path.exists(os.path.join(basedir,picdir)) == True :
blah blah
Sorry, pasted the wrong example...
Better example:
pics = glob.glob(os.path.join
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:21 +0200, Paul Scott wrote:
> example:
>
> if os.path.exists(os.path.join(basedir,picdir)) == True :
> blah blah
>
Sorry, pasted the wrong example...
Better example:
pics = glob.glob(os.path.join(os.path.join(basedir,picdir),'*'))
> Question is, is there a bet
Today, I needed to concatenate a bunch of directory paths and files
together based on user input to create file paths. I achieved this
through nested os.path.join()'s which I am unsure if this is a good
thing or not.
example:
if os.path.exists(os.path.join(basedir,picdir)) == True :
