On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Nick Sarbicki wrote:
> My question then is do you reply to all (with a clean cc list but including
> an OP from outside the list) in response to a persons question, even if the
> question is relatively simple.
>
> For me it's appreciated so that you know someone is
On 9 Sep 2015 07:11, "Ben Finney" wrote:
>
> Terry Reedy writes:
>
> > On 9/8/2015 6:19 PM, Cody Piersall wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > > mailto:pointede...@web.de>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cody Piersall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Please respond to th
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 9/8/2015 6:19 PM, Cody Piersall wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > mailto:pointede...@web.de>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cody Piersall wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please respond to the list as well as the person you're
> > > > actually talking
On 9/8/2015 6:19 PM, Cody Piersall wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
mailto:pointede...@web.de>> wrote:
>
> Cody Piersall wrote:
>
> > Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually
talking
> > to. It works out better for everyone that way.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <
pointede...@web.de> wrote:
>
> Cody Piersall wrote:
>
> > Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually talking
> > to. It works out better for everyone that way. (You should just have
to
> > "reply all" instead of "r
*Boy "eryksun" I can certsainly tell that you are quite a technically -
minded person! All that matters to me is that I can simply type "pip" at
the command prompt without any problems. Well another [lesser] concern is
that I can't use the regular Windows 10 instead of this Build 10074 of it.*
*
Cody Piersall wrote:
> Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually talking
> to. It works out better for everyone that way. (You should just have to
> "reply all" instead of "reply").
“Better” as in “getting/reading/downloading the same message *twice*”?
The rule of thumb
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Steve Burrus wrote:
> well everyone there must be sometjhing about upgrading Python up to version
> 3.5 rc
> because everything works just fine now, beyond my wildest dreams! I am even
> able
> now to type in "pip" and get the usual info. on it and I have connect
*so what is my hopefully sinple solution anyway? i do n't see myself
anytime soon getting off of Build 10074 of Win 10. i don't have pip in the
Scripts folder where I was told it should be. I was thinking of doing a
complete disinstall/reinstall of Python 3.4 to see if that helps. *
*On Fri, Sep
Well actually pip [at least a foolder called pip] is in the
"C:\lib\site-packages" folder but not in any Scripts folder. Should it be
in the Scripts folder?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Cody Piersall
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Steve Burrus
> wrote:
> >
> > "Do you have pip
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Steve Burrus wrote:
>
> "C:\Users\SteveB>py -m pip
> Job information querying failed
You're using build 10074, an old build of Windows 10 that had a buggy
Job object API. This was fixed in build 10159:
http://bugs.python.org/issue24127
FYI, the py launcher runs
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Steve Burrus wrote:
> so what is my hopefully sinple solution anyway? i do n't see myself anytime
> soon getting off of Build 10074 of Win 10.
Script wrappers such as pip.exe are simple versions of the py launcher
that execute an embedded script. For example, here'
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 9:20:14 PM UTC-5, Rob Hills wrote:
> On 05/09/15 08:55, MRAB wrote:
> > On 2015-09-05 01:35, Rob Hills wrote:
> >> On 05/09/15 01:47, Cody Piersall wrote:
> >>> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Steve Burrus
> >>> mailto:steveburru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >> <
On 05/09/15 08:55, MRAB wrote:
> On 2015-09-05 01:35, Rob Hills wrote:
>> On 05/09/15 01:47, Cody Piersall wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Steve Burrus
>>> mailto:steveburru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>> <..>
>>> >> "echo %path%
>>> >>
>>> >> C:\Python34;C:\Python34\python.exe;C:\Pytho
On 2015-09-05 01:35, Rob Hills wrote:
On 05/09/15 01:47, Cody Piersall wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Steve Burrus
mailto:steveburru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
<..>
>> "echo %path%
>>
>> C:\Python34;C:\Python34\python.exe;C:\Python34\Scripts;
It's a long time since I last used Windoze
On 05/09/15 01:47, Cody Piersall wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Steve Burrus
> mailto:steveburru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
<..>
> >> "echo %path%
> >>
> >> C:\Python34;C:\Python34\python.exe;C:\Python34\Scripts;
It's a long time since I last used Windoze in anger, but that second
path e
On 04/09/2015 17:44, Nick Sarbicki wrote:
In the cmd "echo %path%" and send us the output.
Also try to run "pip" as opposed to "python -m pip".
Nick.
Will you please stop top posting, it's driving me nuts, thank you.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
wh
On 04/09/2015 17:04, Steve Burrus wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 5:20:17 PM UTC-5, Steve Burrus wrote:
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I
am having the most extreme problems with simply typing "pip" into my command
prompt and then
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Steve Burrus
wrote:
>
> "Do you have pip.exe in C:\Python34\Scripts?" well I remember seeing it
in thar folder the other day but not now! D oes this mean I have to
re-install python or just pip?
Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually talk
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Steve Burrus
wrote:
>
> "C:\Python34\Tools\Scripts>python checkpip.py
> The latest version of setuptools on PyPI is 18.2, but ensurepip has 12.0.5
> The latest version of pip on PyPI is 7.1.2, but ensurepip has 6.0.8"
>
> I ran this pythpon file, checkpip.py, and g
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Steve Burrus
wrote:
> I mcan assure you that the Scripts folder is in both my Users and the
System path! I even haVE the folder
"C:\Python34\lib\site-packages\django\bin" in the Path. But I still cannot
simply type out "pip" without getti ng the usual error message
In the cmd "echo %path%" and send us the output.
Also try to run "pip" as opposed to "python -m pip".
Nick.
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:41 Steve Burrus wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:12:23 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On 04/09/2015 02:04, Steve Burrus wrote:
> > > On Thursday, S
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:12:23 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 02:04, Steve Burrus wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:06:27 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> >> On 03/09/2015 23:20, Steve Burrus wrote:
> >>> Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus
wrote:
>
> Well I think that this is a Win 10 "thing" befcause using previous
versions of Windows all I had to do was to type in "pip" to get the pip
info. but now apparently it's "python -m pip". Can someone please "set me
straight" about the path I
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 5:20:17 PM UTC-5, Steve Burrus wrote:
> Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python
> 3.4. But I am having the most extreme problems with simply typing "pip" into
> my command prompt and then getting back the normal information on
On 4 September 2015 at 15:14, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 04:27:47 +0100, Mark Lawrence
> declaimed the following:
>
>
>>python3 just doesn't exist on Windows, it's always python.exe or
>
> Really?
>
> [snip]
> 09/17/2013 12:37 AM40,448 python.exe
> 09/17/20
> Just typing 'pip' as you do does't work because pip.exe is located in
Python\Scripts
directory which in not included on variable %PATH%
Is that new for win10?
Just "pip" works fine on my win7 install. Although maybe I had to extend
the path and forgot...
- Nick
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:26 ast w
"ast" a écrit dans le message de
news:55e9372e$0$3019$426a3...@news.free.fr...
"Steve Burrus" a écrit dans le message de
news:f0876c48-010e-4bf0-b687-dceefba97...@googlegroups.com...
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I am having
the most
"Steve Burrus" a écrit dans le message de
news:f0876c48-010e-4bf0-b687-dceefba97...@googlegroups.com...
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I am having
the most extreme problems with simply typing "pip" into my command prompt and then getting b
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> python3 just doesn't exist on Windows, it's always python.exe or
> pythonw.exe. Not that I'd recommend using them in this day and age, py.exe
> or pyw.exe and specify your version via the command line or a shebang line
> in your script is cer
On 04/09/2015 04:08, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/09/2015 02:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus
wrote:
I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my
command prompt and the 'py
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Steve Burrus wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 8:55:52 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus
>> wrote:
>> > I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my
>> > command prompt and the 'py
On 04/09/2015 02:04, Steve Burrus wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:06:27 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 03/09/2015 23:20, Steve Burrus wrote:
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I
am having the most extreme problems with simply typ
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 8:55:52 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus wrote:
> > I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my
> > command prompt and the 'python easy-install.py" command a little less. I
> > swear I ha
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 02:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my
>>> command prompt and the 'python easy-install.py" comma
On 04/09/2015 02:55, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus wrote:
I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my command
prompt and the 'python easy-install.py" command a little less. I swear I have
set ALL of the env. variables correctly
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Steve Burrus wrote:
> I have tried the 'python get-pip.py' command over amnd over again in my
> command prompt and the 'python easy-install.py" command a little less. I
> swear I have set ALL of the env. variables correctly! My OS is Windows 10
> Beta Preview Bu
On 2015-09-04 02:04, Steve Burrus wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:06:27 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 03/09/2015 23:20, Steve Burrus wrote:
> Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I
am having the most extreme problems with simply ty
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:06:27 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 23:20, Steve Burrus wrote:
> > Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in
> > Python 3.4. But I am having the most extreme problems with simply typing
> > "pip" into my command prom
On 03/09/2015 23:20, Steve Burrus wrote:
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python 3.4. But I
am having the most extreme problems with simply typing "pip" into my command
prompt and then getting back the normal information on pip! I have repeatedly downloaded
Well I hjave certainly noted more than once that pip is cont ained in Python
3.4. But I am having the most extreme problems with simply typing "pip" into my
command prompt and then getting back the normal information on pip! I have
repeatedly downloaded [to my Desktop] that get-pip.py file then
41 matches
Mail list logo
