On Monday, December 15, 2014 9:52:58 PM UTC-8, Jason Swails wrote:
> This was a problem posed to me, which I solved in Python. I thought it was
> neat and enjoyed the exercise of working through it; feel free to ignore.
> For people looking for little projects to practice their skills with (or
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:52:58 AM UTC-5, Jason Swails wrote:
> This was a problem posed to me, which I solved in Python. I thought it was
> neat and enjoyed the exercise of working through it; feel free to ignore.
> For people looking for little projects to practice their skills with (o
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:46:16 -0500, Jason Swails wrote:
> I liked this problem because naive solutions scale as O(2^N), begging for
> a more efficient approach.
Project Euler has this one, twice; problems 18 and 67.
The difference between the two is that problem 18 has 15 rows while
problem 67 h
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jason Swails
wrote:
>
> This was a problem posed to me, which I solved in Python. I thought it
was neat and enjoyed the exercise of working through it; feel free to
ignore. For people looking for little projects to practice their skills
with (or a simple distrac
This was a problem posed to me, which I solved in Python. I thought it was
neat and enjoyed the exercise of working through it; feel free to ignore.
For people looking for little projects to practice their skills with (or a
simple distraction), read on.
You have a triangle of numbers such that ea
