Re: Naming conventions (was: Re: refering to base classes)

2006-08-30 Thread Neil Cerutti
On 2006-08-30, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:22:16 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>"glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: >>> > It might be better to use newstyle classes if you can. Also, the >>> > convention i

Re: Naming conventions (was: Re: refering to base classes)

2006-08-29 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:22:16 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: >> > It might be better to use newstyle classes if you can. Also, the >> > convention is to use CamelCase for classes names (unless you have >> > a strong r

Naming conventions (was: Re: refering to base classes)

2006-08-29 Thread Ben Finney
"glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > > It might be better to use newstyle classes if you can. Also, the > > convention is to use CamelCase for classes names (unless you have > > a strong reason to do otherwise). Note that this style is more correctly called TitleCase