[snip]
Provided you don't change the order of the items in the tuple, you can
just use slicing:
a, b = f()[ : 2]
Yes, this is what you would normally do with tuples. But i find this
syntax very implicit and awkward. Also, you cannot skip elements, so
you often end up with things like
a,
On Jun 20, 9:38 am, Giuseppe Ottaviano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found the namedtuple very convenient for rapid prototyping code, for
> functions that have to return a number of results that could grow as
> the code evolves. They are more elegant than dicts, and I don't have
> to create
I found the namedtuple very convenient for rapid prototyping code, for
functions that have to return a number of results that could grow as
the code evolves. They are more elegant than dicts, and I don't have
to create a new explicit class. Unfortunately in this situation they
lose the conv
